TRADEMARK CLEARINGHOUSE
Registration at the TMCH Within the scope of
the Trademark Claims
service, a potential domain name registrant gets a warning notice when attempting to register a domain name that matches a recorded sign in the TMCH. If, aſter receiving and accepting the notice, the domain name registrant further registers the domain name, the trademark holder with a corresponding mark will receive notification of the domain name registration, so that it can take any appropriate action.
Tis means that the applicant for registration of the domain name is the first to be informed that a conflict could result from the domain name registration. Te trademark owner having registered (with costs) its trademarks with the TMCH is only informed second, if the domain name applicant decides to pursue the registration despite the notification. Terefore, the domain name applicant can decide that it will not pursue the registration of the domain name and wait until the 90-day notification period is over. Figuratively speaking, the system offered by the Trademark Claims service is like giving a thief the choice to steal a car now and probably get prosecuted, or to steal it later and not worry about prosecution.
Furthermore, the time period fixed for the
Trademark Claims service is quite short. What will happen aſter the expiry of the Trademarks Claims period? Tird parties will still be able to register domain names that are similar or identical to
trademarks recorded with the
TMCH, and owners will not be notified about it any more.
As a further limitation, the clearance offered by the TMCH covers only identical signs—but what about similar signs? A risk of confusion may also occur with similar signs, where the TMCH does not provide notifications to trademark owners about applied similar infringing domain names. For example, there is no protection against typosquatters (or URL hijackers), who rely on mistakes such as typographical errors made by Internet users when they type a website address into a web browser, and lead them to their website and not to the originally intended website.
Not registering at the TMCH
Not recording a trademark with the TMCH means that the trademark owner will not be eligible to register a domain name during the Sunrise Period. Consequently, aſter the launch of a new gTLD the first person requesting registration of a domain incorporating a trademark will own it according to the ‘first come, first served’ principle. Even if we cannot
“TRADEMARK OWNERS SHOULD NOT GIVE UP THEIR WATCHING ACTIVITIES AND SHOULD CONTINUE TO MONITOR WHICH DOMAIN NAMES ARE APPLIED FOR BY THIRD PARTIES.”
prerequisites are respected. A procedure before a court remains available.
It is important to keep in mind that the creation of the TMCH is definitely a good way to improve the awareness of trademark owners about potential infringements, but it is only one of several measures. Trademark owners should not give up their watching activities and should continue to monitor which domain names are applied for by third parties. Tey should review their trademark portfolio, ideally with the help of their legal adviser, consider the budgetary aspect and choose which strategy they want to adopt. Tey can choose to be offensive and register all their trademarks with the TMCH or to rely on the services of a domain name watch service provider, but there is a risk that following the launch of a new gTLD that the first person requesting registration of a domain incorporating one of their trademarks will own it.
In July 2013, Deloitte revealed that more than 5,000 trademarks have already been recorded with the TMCH. Let’s see what the future brings and whether the number of registered trademarks is going to further increase or whether the utility of the TMCH will begin to be discussed.
Clémence Le Cointe is a French trademark attorney at Dennemeyer & Associates in Munich. She can be contacted at
clecointe@dennemeyer-law.com .
deny the advantage to be able to register domain names before others during the Sunrise Period, the protection is complete only if associated with the Trademark Claims service.
As mentioned above, the question can be raised whether this period of time is sufficient to provide satisfactory protection to trademark owners against potential domain name registration that could lead to confusion among the public. Terefore, the trademark owner should continue to watch domain registries outside the TMCH. A number of watch service providers exist that can help trademark owners monitor the registration of potential infringing domain names.
Moreover, not registering trademarks with the TMCH does not prevent trademark owners from undertaking later necessary steps against infringement. If a third party was to register a domain name that would prejudice an already registered trademark for being too similar, the owner of the prejudiced trademark would still have
the opportunity to engage
in procedures such as alternative dispute resolution proceedings according to the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy, if the
134 World Intellectual Property Review September/October 2013
Clémence Le Cointe holds a Master’s degree in IP law. She is experienced in the management of outsourced trademark portfolios of international companies and assists multinational clients, especially in the pharmaceutical industry in all relevant trademark matters.
Dennemeyer & Associates is an international IP law firm, providing the full range of legal services relating to intellectual assets worldwide.
www.worldipreview.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196