JURISDICTION REPORT: CHILE
MODIFICATIONS TO CHILE’S TRADEMARK LAW
Rodrigo Cooper Cooper & Cia
Chile is a small but relatively successful country, which has enjoyed commercial stability and growth over the past 30 years, since it implemented the free market economy at the beginning of the 1980s.
Although the market is not large, it works well, and a large selection of products and services from across the world can be found in the country.
Te trademark law was passed in 1991, and since then has undergone three relevant modifications, intended to adapt it to international agreements, such as TRIPS, economic association with the EU, a free trade agreement with the US, the Patent Cooperation Treaty and Trademark Law Treaty.
In short, the modifications have come in patches, and the Chilean government has realised the need to develop new rules based on a global vision in accordance with Chilean interests and not just based on compliance with different, and in some cases independent, agreements.
Last May, the government sent a bill to Congress aimed at completely replacing the Industrial Property Law, making important changes to all kinds of privileges, and especially in connection with trademarks.
Te bill proposes relevant modifications both to substantive and procedural rules. As mentioned by government, the purpose of the new law is to adapt to reality through four areas:
• Increased coverage of rights over all type of creations and improve enforcement actions;
• Quicker and simpler administrative procedures;
• Lower costs, in order to increase applications for all types of industrial property; and
• Improved legal certainty for IP owners as well as third parties.
As far as trademarks are concerned, the bill proposes a new definition of a trademark, including three-dimensional trademarks and other non- conventional trademarks, such as smell marks. Slogans are strengthened, and acquire independence from the trademarks to which they are associated.
Regulations are introduced for collective and certification trademarks and the treatment of geographic indications and denominations of origin is improved. Also, in compliance with the Paris Convention, for the first time trade names are recognised. Tese will not require registration.
Te most important modifications are related to the requirement of use of registered trademarks. Until now, Chile is one of the very few countries in the world where the non-use of a registered trademark does not affect its validity. In accordance with the proposed bill, the lack of use of a registration
“FOLLOWING CHILEAN PRACTICE, THE PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS IS ENHANCED, STRENGTHENING THE ACTIONS AVAILABLE AGAINST APPLICATIONS MADE IN BAD FAITH OR AGAINST CONSUMER INTERESTS.”
for a period of five years may give rise for an action for cancellation for non-use. In a more controversial matter, the bill proposes that a registered trademark may also be cancelled when its owner has tolerated its loss of distinctiveness and the expression has fallen into common use.
Another relevant proposal is the elimination of two special classes, additional to the 45 of the Nice Classification, that exist in Chile as a remnant of the previous law: for the name of a commercial establishment or store, and for the name of an industrial establishment or factory.
Following Chilean practice, the protection of well-known trademarks is enhanced, strengthening the actions available against applications made in bad faith or against consumer interests.
For the first time, the law expressly recognises dilution. Tis was not previously considered in our law and practice, but the new law prohibits registration of signs that may cause dilution of well-known trademarks.
One of the major criticisms of the Chilean trademark system is the low efficiency of enforcement. In this matter, the proposed bill establishes a public legal action to prosecute crimes of trademark counterfeiting, geographical indications and denominations of origin. Te current law sanctions counterfeiting only with fines, which are considered low. Te new proposal increases the penalties and includes the possibility of infringers being condemned to jail, because the conduct not only affects the trademark owner, but also the good faith which governs commercial relations.
Another matter that the bill tries to resolve is the difficulty under our general legal system of proving effective damages when claiming compensation. Te bill establishes statutory damages in the case of trademark infringement.
Many other modifications are proposed, to trademarks and all IP privileges, but there is not enough space to address them in detail here.
Rodrigo Cooper is a senior partner at Cooper & Cia and a professor of IP Law at the Universidad de Chile. He can be contacted at:
rcooper@cooper.cl
164 World Intellectual Property Review September/October 2013
www.worldipreview.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196