This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Opinion


On the back of last year’s rail franchising debacle the government should seize the opportunity to allow more open access competition alongside franchises says Tony Lodge


‘O


ur objective is to improve the quality of railway services by creating many new opportunities for private sector involvement. This will


mean more competition, greater efficiency and a wider choice of services more closely tailored to what customers want.’ Twenty years ago the above statement from the then Transport Secretary, John MacGregor, formed the backbone of Tory ideology for one of the most controversial and politically difficult of all the privatisations of the Thatcher and Major period. The decision to privatise British Rail was not taken lightly. A small Tory majority, opposition from the powerful rail unions, the John Smith led Labour Party and various so called ‘passenger groups’ threatened to undermine one of the most radical of all Tory sell-offs. But a radical solution was needed to break a draconian consensus. During the 1960’s and 70’s both political parties decided that rail demand was doomed to decline and moved to close a third of the railway network in the now famous ‘Beeching’ review. Demand for rail travel declined steadily from 1955 to 1982 and was again falling in the early 1990’s. Consequently, it is important to contrast the challenges facing the railways in the early 1990’s, compared with today. Faced with a gradual but supposed terminal passenger decline, the government wanted to deliver private investment, lower subsidies, more passenger choice and more competition. In parallel it wanted to detach the politics of rail from Whitehall, as it had with other nationalised industries such as telecommunications. Today, albeit twenty years late, the ambitions in the Minister’s quote are upheld in new research and statistics; rail competition is finally delivering for passengers and the government, but on too small a scale. The policy was and remains right, but it must now be more widely applied. While the Conservatives hoped and planned for the emergence of up to 100 rail companies, which would compete for business over one private infrastructure system, the reality has emerged where


Page 42 June 2013


fewer companies bid for franchises to operate rail services over a fixed long timescale. The winner is the company seeking the lowest subsidy or offering the highest premium with other pledges of service and investment. Importantly, most franchise winners will not face any long- distance non-franchised competition. Critics complain, with some justification, that privatisation has allowed modern-day long distance passenger monopolies – or railopolies - to emerge where franchises face no effective competition. In comparison, competition has been hugely successful for rail freight which was privatised alongside the passenger sector. It has benefited from strong on-rail competition which has led to investment in new rolling stock, high levels of productivity and reduced costs to satisfy market demand. (see Table 1) So what about the passenger sector?


On the East Coast Main Line (ECML), private non-subsidised and non- franchised ‘open access’ rail operators such as Grand Central and First Hull Trains compete with the line’s franchise holder and this competition has provided some revealing new statistics. They show how long-distance rail competition delivers lower fares, higher revenues and greater rail use without threatening the viability of the ECML franchise holder. New research shows that those stations which enjoy long-distance ‘open access’ on-rail competition with the franchise holder, such as Doncaster, York, Northallerton and Wakefield, have seen (on average) passenger journeys increase by 42 per cent, compared with 27 per cent for those without competition, such as Leeds. (See Table 2).


Revenue has also increased at a faster rate (57 per cent compared to 48 per cent)


Since 1993 the rail network has witnessed unprecedented growth. Passenger traffic has doubled with UK rail passenger numbers growing faster than all other European countries. It is expected to double again by 2030. The explosion in demand for rail travel since privatisation has reversed all previous predictions. More people are travelling by train than at any time since 1929 on a rail network almost half the size and enjoying the highest levels of safety on record.


where competition occurs. Importantly, at Edinburgh where no direct on-rail competition exists on the ECML to serve London, fares have soared. (See Table 3).


Crucially for passengers, at stations where open access services compete with the franchise holder average fares increased by only 11 per cent compared with 17 per cent at those stations without. In the past, franchised rail operators have complained to ministers that


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132