MARCH/APRIL 2013
High speed rail
“The key is allowing corporate travellers an informed choice, and in future a traveller should be able to compare door-to-door journeys using rail or air,” he says. “It’s all about considering the rail option, but today the vast majority will opt for air if the rail journey takes over four hours. But even though fares can be 25 per cent lower by rail, many European travellers judge a four- to five-hour train journey as too long.” Amadeus has made major strides integrating rail, and head of Amadeus Rail, Thomas Drexler, says Trenitalia, the Italian operator, is the first to be displayed alongside airlines. French operator SNCF is also being integrated, with the German and Swedish national operators to follow this year. “Development of our Total Rail system is not dependent on what the EC is doing, but we are very much in favour of implementing common standards on fares and timetables,” Drexler says. Eurostar also has plans for more direct routes from London, and it already operates some routes deeper into France for the leisure market, with a new direct service to Lyon and Aix en Provence being trialled in May and June this year. New trains, due to be delivered by 2015, could operate further afield, but equally they might be used to increase frequency to Paris and Brussels.
Of more immediate interest to UK corporates is refurbishment of the existing fleet, now nearly 20 years old. This includes wifi – a significant omission at present – and new interiors by Italian design firm Pininfarina. The refurbishment programme is due for completion by 2015 and, with the new trains, represents an investment of £700 million. Eurostar head of sales Darren Williams says: “Connections from Lille, Brussels and Paris remain a key element of our strategy for this year. Our research shows that there are 20 million people taking short-haul flights between the UK and locations in Europe that are easily accessible by rail. We believe this presents a significant business opportunity.”
80
SLASHING JOURNEY TIMES Britain has less high-speed track than any other major western European country – a mere 70-odd miles from London to the Channel Tunnel. But by 2026 HS2 should have reached Birmingham (140 miles), and by 2032 a Y-shaped extension to Manchester and Leeds should add a further 211 miles.
Journey times will be slashed not just to these cities, as high-speed trains will continue over existing tracks to many other centres. London-Birmingham will come down to 41 minutes from one hour eight minutes; Leeds to one hour 22 minutes from two hours 12 minutes; and Manchester to one hour eight minutes from two hours eight minutes. HS2 stations will also be provided at Birmingham and Manchester airports to dramatically widen their catchment areas, but Heathrow will only be served via a Crossrail connection in west London (from 2026), pending the Airports Commission report on capacity. Cities off the HS2 route to benefit will include Newcastle (down to two hours 18 minutes from two hours 52 minutes), and Liverpool (one hour 36 minutes from two hours eight minutes), while inter-regional traffic will also benefit with a 20-minute journey time between East Midlands and Birmingham. Edinburgh and Glasgow will be brought within about three-
“In future a traveller should be able to compare journeys using rail or air”
and-a-half hours of London, although the Scottish Parliament hopes to raise the money to build a high-speed line heading south to meet HS2. This may all seem like the promise of jam tomorrow, and even this timescale could slip due to legal challenges or construction difficulties. The reality is we have to make do with what we’ve got for the foreseeable future, though what we have on inter- city routes (up to 125 mph) is better than many businesses realise. But what are the opportunities for modal shift from airlines? Virgin Trains (now operating the contentious West Coast Mainline franchise until November 2014) has eclipsed airlines on the Manchester- London route, while East Coast is dominant from Leeds, where there is now no air service to London. East Coast has 60 per cent of the Newcastle- London market and 24 per cent of Edinburgh-London, despite a journey time of four to four-and-a-half hours – up two percentage points in a year. CWT’s Total Impact Report compares air and rail travel, taking into account not only fares and journey times, but
JOURNEY REPORT SPAIN
THE 230-MILE JOURNEY from Burgos in northern Spain to Madrid passes pleasantly enough in just under two-and-a-half hours – covering a similar distance to London-Exeter, and taking about the same time, writes Dave Richardson. First class is very comfortable and I was able to work, but with no wifi or power points. There’s a complimentary at-seat service of newspapers, drinks and snacks, but it’s nothing exceptional. Within a few years, however, this will be a high-speed route with a dramatically reduced journey time. Spain already has the most extensive high-speed network in Europe and is building more, with the cross- border route from France opening shortly to make Paris-Barcelona possible in six-and-a-half hours. I take a taxi across Madrid to try out Spain’s high-speed AVE service for myself. The futuristic new trains operate to Barcelona, Valencia, Seville and Malaga, and have wiped out most of the air competition on these routes. My non-stop journey to Valencia (about 250 miles)
takes less than one hour 35 minutes – about the distance from London to Durham, which takes around two hours 45 minutes. We hit top speed within six minutes – there’s a display monitor – and have left the sprawling capital behind a few minutes later. Even in standard class the 2x2 seating is much roomier than British trains or on an aircraft, with plenty of room to work. I reach Valencia refreshed and ready for my meeting, thinking: roll on HS2. Within a few years Burgos will have a high-speed service – but Exeter never will. Tickets booked by Rail Europe cost from
£25 (standard class) and £36.50 (first class) for Burgos-Madrid; and £58 (standard class) and £69.50 (first class) for Madrid-Valencia. Tel: 0844 848 4070;
www.raileurope.co.uk
also productivity on the move and the cost of carbon offsetting. On Glasgow- London, rail accounts for an 8 per cent market share for one business client, but the average ticket price is £45 lower, and the city centre-to-city centre journey only one hour longer. CO2 emissions are 83.2kg less by rail, and the company could save £76,762 a year on fares. ■
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128