This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
MARCH/APRIL 2013


High speed rail


Germany, we haven’t seen a noticeable shift from air to rail. France and Germany are traditionally seen as the high-speed rail countries in Europe, and we do see some policies in these countries that mandate the use of rail for specific routes. These policies are either clearly spelling out the top routes, such as Paris-Lyon or Frankfurt- Stuttgart, or give a maximum rail travel time saying all destinations which can be reached within three hours have to be by train. “CWT Solutions Group sees rail as a potential triple bottom-line gain: increased productivity on journeys, cost-savings, and a reduction in CO2 emissions. Research shows that high-speed rail is preferred to air for trips up to three hours in 16 European countries, and 55 per cent of travel managers surveyed by CWT said their companies promote the use of high- speed rail as an alternative to air.”


78


PROMISES AND PROBLEMS Despite this promising scenario, there are problems booking high-speed rail which will take years to resolve. Also, UK travellers will have to overcome a mindset that journeys of up to three or four hours are the maximum comfortably done by rail (relevant once Europe-wide connections are available), while delays to opening new business routes from London are also a major disappointment. Deutsche Bahn (DB) – the German national operator – had hoped to start direct services from London to Cologne and Frankfurt, and also from London to Rotterdam and


Amsterdam, by the end of this year. But this will not now happen for at least another three to four years, due to problems commissioning the highly complex trains by the manufacturer, Siemens. Despite this, DB was voted Best Rail Operator in the Business Travel Awards this year, beating off the other finalists Eurostar and Heathrow Express. Its Eco Plus offer, which enables carbon-free business travel in Germany for registered companies, was decisive in the win, sitting alongside a suite of business travel products, including discounts for corporates spending at least Ð3,000


“Deutsche Bahn is still determined to operate London services, as there is a strong business case”


a year. DB sales director Oliver Schmidt says: “We are very pleased with the award, as it is hard for an operator that doesn’t yet have a UK service to win. The issue of our direct trains from London is a real shambles, as in 2009 we ordered 16 new trains to serve these routes. Siemens said it could deliver in December 2011, giving us two years to gain the necessary approvals, but the first trains arrived faulty. But we are still determined to operate London services, as there is a strong business case. The existing service connecting with Eurostar in Brussels is good, but in the meantime my task is to keep the UK market warm – or lukewarm.” A journey time of four hours to Cologne and five hours to Frankfurt is promised – with the


current fastest journey time to Cologne of about four-and-a-half hours already attracting a few business travellers. But whether direct services to Cologne, Frankfurt, Rotterdam and Amsterdam will ever challenge the airlines is open to question.


MENTAL BARRIER Head of rail for Capita Business Travel – the biggest travel management company (TMC) selling rail in Britain – Raj Sachdave, says: “There is still a mental barrier in the UK that four hours is the maximum business travellers are prepared to spend on a train. That is different in Europe because of the culture and the extensive high-speed network, but the UK traveller has yet to experience what high-speed rail can offer in productivity, connectivity and ease of ticketing. In Europe, the mental barrier is more like six hours. Awareness will change when more direct trains are running.”


Ticketing is another problem faced by TMCs and buyers, as rail is only just starting to be integrated with air, hotel and other bookings on global distribution systems (GDSs). The European Commission (EC) is leading a project throughout the European Union to get rail operators to supply fares, timetables and other data in a common format, which would allow GDSs and others to connect to a common-user system, as with airlines. Progress is slow, although HRG director of industry and fare distribution, Tony Berry, hopes for progress within two years.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128