This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Behind every great tool there’s a great idea


dies can be reduced and maintained, the wall thickness of the can be controlled and reduced. All these functions are dependent on the directionality and control of the surface finish on both components.


The punch must have the random isotropic surface discussed in #2 above and the dies must have a negatively skewed surface, discussed in #1 above, that is in the direction of the drawn material (perpendicular to the diameter of the die). When all these criteria are met, one can expect bright OD finished cans that strip eas- ily (reducing scrap) and have a minimally thick wall. Wall thickness is not a trivial matter—savings of up to $10M per year per 0.001" (0.0254-mm) wall thickness reduction in a given can plant have been reported. To summarize: Mass media finishing techniques (barrel, vibratory, centrifugal and spindle finish) can be used to improve part performance and service life, and these processes can be tailored or modified to amplify this effect. Although the ability of these processes to drive down deburring and surface finishing costs when compared to manual procedures is well known and documented, their ability to dramatically affect part performance and service life is not widely recognized, nor well understood.


Abundant opportunities exist for part performance and part life improvement with substantial economic advantages. All that is required is a more thoughtful and purposeful approach to the selection and implementation of the mass finishing processes available to manufacturers. ME


Further Reading


1. Massarsky, Dr. M. L., Davidson, D. A. “Turbo-Charged Abrasive Machining Offers Consistency, Uniformity,” Products Finishing, June 2012 Vol. 76, No. 9, pp. 24-27, Cincinatti, OH: Gardner Publications


2. Clark, Jack, Massarsky, Dr. M. L., Davidson, D. A. “It’s the Finish That Counts”, Metal Finishing, July 2005, pp 24-29, White Plains, NY: Elsevier Science


3. Davidson, D. A., “Precision Finishing Processes in Centrifugal Barrel Equipment,” Metal Finishing, July/August 2005, pp 65-67. White Plains, NY: Elsevier Science


4. Massarsky, Dr. M. L., Davidson, D. A., “Turbo-Abrasive Machining and Turbo-Polishing in the Continuous Flow Manufacturing Environment”, SME Technical Paper MR99-264, [Conference Proceedings: 3rd International Machining and Grinding Conference, Cincinnati, OH, Oct 4–7, 1999] Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1999.


5.


Davidson, D. A., “Surface Condition Impacts Part Performance,” Metal Finishing, February 2007, White Plains, NY: Elsevier Science


6. Gillespie, LaRoux, Mass Finishing Handbook, pp 68-69, New York, NY: Industrial Press, 2007


November 2012 | ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com 85


TOOLS PLUS IDEAS www.komet.com


800-656-6381 The idea:


Extending the technology behind the proven KUB Quatron® cutter.


drills to a milling


Why it’s great: • Removes large quantities of material at high feed rates.


• Plunge milling of deep grooves and large cavities.


• Utilizes same 4-effective inserts as our KUB Quatron®


drills.


Learn more about this and other great ideas.


Go to www.komet.com/greatideas or scan this QR code.


The tool:


KOMET KUB® Quatron hi.feed High-performance milling cutter


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124