This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ShopSolutions Case Histories of Manufacturing Problem Solving Tangential Milling Secures Roughing Process T


o solve a production problem in a high-volume setting, R.H. Sheppard Inc. (Hanover, PA) found that tangen- tial milling improves process security for a difficult


rough-milling operation. The lesson here is that you don’t have to settle for the first thing that works better. Dig deeper for what’s best. That’s why manufacturing engineers at R.H. Sheppard spent almost a year working to fix a tool wreck problem in a rough-milling operation. Rather than settle on the first new tool that could marginally improve things, they dug deeper to uncover the single best solution from among more than eight tool- ing providers. The result: no more tool wrecks or their associated production stoppages—plus an unexpected 30–40% bump in throughput. Together, these gains helped the company con- tain costs and improve delivery performance for demanding customers. The annualized sav- ing exceeds $100,000, offsetting higher energy and other indirect costs that are beyond the company’s control.


R.H. Sheppard is a leading first-tier supplier of OEM power steering components for trans- portation industries worldwide. The Hanover, PA, plant has 160 employees and runs 20 hours a day, four days a week, 50 weeks a year. Annual volume for the workpiece in ques- tion, a power steering housing made of ductile cast iron, is 100,000.


The housing in question is essentially an 8 ½" (216-mm) long casting with a 3.937" (100-mm) bore diameter that is machined in a manually fed multipart setup on a horizontal CNC machine. The operator loads holemaking operations. The operation that caused the problem, which occurs twice in an 18-step process, is rough-milling the mating surfaces on both ends. Since the parts are run four-up, it is by definition an interrupted cut. With the previous radial cutter, an insert


Key to the gain was the switch to tangential milling with an S-MAX face mill from Ingersoll Cutting Tools (Rockford, IL) that features a stronger cutting geometry. The previous cutter was a conven- tional mill, with inserts oriented radially. In tangential milling, the insert lies flat in the pitch circle, presenting its strongest cross section to the main cutting force. Size for size, the cutter body is stronger, and, according to Allen Smith, R.H. Shep- pard manufacturing superintendent, “the selected inserts also are larger and more robust.”


Ingersoll’s Randy Bohm (left) and R.H. Sheppard’s Allen Smith examine the 6" (152-mm) tangential S-MAX face mill that delivered process security for the punishing job of rough-milling power steering housings made of ductile cast iron.


edge would spontaneously rupture, starting the chain reaction leading to irreparable damage to the cutter itself. The damaged insert doesn’t take off its share of material, which overloads the next insert to failure—all in a split second. If the operator can’t shut down quickly enough, the excessive cutting forces over- load the entire cutter body to the point where insert seats break out or the cutter gets bent out of shape.


November 2012 | ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com 49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124