Dr Mike Milanovic, the head of University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations, which teaches and certifies English language proficiency, talks to NHE about the role of NHS trusts in ensuring foreign staff have adequate language skills.
T
he standard of English possessed by foreign staff working in the NHS is a
subject of frequent concern for many pa- tients, newspapers – and for ministers too.
Although non-EU staff must verify Eng- lish language competence via the rigorous IELTS test, there are rules that stop the GMC conducting similar testing of peo- ple coming from the within the EU, which prompted a recent letter to a newspaper from the presidents of the royal colleges of surgeons and physicians, saying it could put patients at risk.
Health secretary Andrew Lansley has promised to strengthen checks at a local level, although the relevant European com- missioner, Michael Barnier, has claimed that the EU rules often cited are a myth, and that it was the UK’s own decision to impose a ban on strict language checks. He said in a newspaper article that the checks “…are not explicitly imposed by EU law. But neither are they outlawed. So this is a matter for member states to decide.”
There is certainly confusion over the issue. Dr Mike Milanovic, the head of University of Cambridge ESOL, which certifies Eng- lish language competence for four million people a year at 2,500 global examination centres, said using an external frame of reference, such as the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) would be very helpful.
This grades a person’s English on a six-step ladder, from A1 to C2, with an A1 speaker only able to converse, read and write at the most basic level, while a C2 speaker can talk about complex and sensitive issues, under- stand colloquial references, appreciate the finer points of complex texts and so on.
Dr Milanovic said a frontline clinical mem- ber of staff should be at least C1, telling NHE: “That is near the top end of the profi- ciency continuum.
“It would make a great deal of sense to have a mechanism in place to allow hospitals and NHS trusts and so forth to verify that the staff they’re getting from within and without the EU have an adequate command
80 | national health executive Jan/Feb 12
of English that isn’t going to endanger anyone.
“In an ideal world, you’d want all your staff to have adequate levels of English to deal with all situations they’re likely to come up against. Of course, it’s not an ideal world, so you end up establishing minimum standards, and so when we talk about C1, that’s not the desirable standard necessar- ily – it’s the minimum we would expect.
“My personal view is that the critical fac- tor is that the hospital, or the employer, understands the concept of a language pro- ficiency scale.
“They can then look at the different roles they have, and designate levels of profi- ciency that will allow those people to op- erate effectively in the roles they’re going to be doing. Then they need to designate publicly available, secure, reliable exami- nations that they can put on a list, and say ‘if you come to us with a certificate at this level, we’ll take that as evidence that lan- guage competence per se will not prevent you doing the job’.
“They will not be able to verify it them- selves, not in any reliable way – the only re- liable way is through external certification.
“Employers might use that as one of the
criteria they look at, or offer language im- provement classes for people to work on their English, perhaps making them man- datory, or charging for them, or saying ‘you can have a job but you need to go from B2 to C1 and we’ll offer you six months work of English to support that’, for example. As far as I’m aware at the moment it’s very much left up to the individual staff members – but of course for the NHS, funding is the issue.”
Dr Milanovic also said it was important to remember that multilingual staff also bring many benefits to the NHS.
He explained: “There’s a great danger that when we start talking about language standards, we confuse that with some type of racial discrimination, and it’s not about that at all; it’s about patients and patient care. Obviously, when people come in from other countries and cultures, most of us recognise that it enriches our society. It al- lows for them to com- municate with patients from that background and all of that helps in building mutual un- derstanding, which is so important.”
Dr Mike Milanovic
FOR MORE INFORMATION Visit
www.cambridgeesol.org
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84