Claire Wells, performance manager at Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, talks to NHE about the integration of digital dictation and overcoming the teething problems that all trials experience.
speeding up both turnaround times and clinical time spent moving from site to site are all benefits of digital dictation.
S
At Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust, one of the country’s largest, with more than 3,000 staff serving a population of more than 800,000 people, a project incorporating both digital transcription and voice recognition elements is set to bring these improvements and more into the workplace.
However, they’re not quite there yet, as Claire Wells, performance manager in the forensics department, explains.
Wells said: “There were a few technical problems at the beginning, but as improvements have been made to it and people have got used to it, they do really like it.
“It was difficult to start with; you always end up ironing out all the teething problems when you pilot things, as with any sort of change in management, especially when you’re involving senior clinical staff and getting them to change their practices. That’s been the biggest hurdle really.”
The pilot, which began in spring 2011, was confined initially to 34 medical staff, before being expanded to more clinical staff and administrators. The work is not outsourced at the moment, although this has not been ruled out in the future.
Timesaver
Digital dictation does still offer great improvements to the Trust though, as community staff are currently using a BlackBerry app for dictation, enabling them to send files from
avings on admin costs, redistributing transcription into a more regular workflow and
wherever they are, straight into the workflow.
She explained: “That’s been a huge timesaver for them. It also stops bottlenecks in admin, because you would find that consultants who were based in the community would come back to base on a Friday and dump a big pile of paper on the desk and everything’s ‘urgent’; so this allows the workflow to flow a bit more smoothly. We don’t get the peaks and troughs we used to get.
“The Trust works across all three boroughs, so in terms of management, it’s much easier. If we’ve got a shortage in Haringey, to send the work up to Barnet, it’s just a click of a button and it’s moved into the Barnet workflow.”
Voice recognition
The next step for efficient transcription is voice recognition, which can again reduce the workload for admin staff and speed up turnaround times.
Wells said: “We’re just starting to launch the voice recognition component. We’ve targeted five of our more prolific authors, because they are the ones who are generating a predominant amount of the work.”
Once the training for this is complete, this will increase the savings on admin time, Wells suggested, although while these innovations can cut costs, “that doesn’t necessarily mean a loss of jobs”, she said. “It just means that their time can be spent doing the 101 other things they have to do as well.
“The system we bought from BigHand allows staff to dictate a job into a voice recorder and submit that into a transcription server. That then gets converted into a document, goes to an administrator to proofread and comes back to doctors for sign off.”
The benefits this can bring depend on the reliability of the voice recognition software, Wells said, but
she added: “Once accuracy levels are up to about 98% then they will just submit the jobs and get those straight back, sign them off and send to dispatch.
“We’ve got five doctors using it at the moment. We’ve been trying to train it through the back end of the system so what’s been happening is the secretaries have been typing the dictation, giving me the voice file and the paper file and then I can match them together in the back end as a training tool.”
Obstacles
She continued: “The problem is nobody actually dictates what eventually gets typed. You get doctors saying ‘Oh hi Sue, this is Tim and I’m doing a report on…’ and that’s not what the secretary then types, so that’s been a bit painful.”
These details are included when the job is submitted to the workflow, so it is unnecessary information to include, she notes, adding: “We’re trying to get them to do things the
national health executive Jan/Feb 12 37
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84