PATIENT SAFETY
Far too many high-risk patients are dying after surgery, with few of them informed properly about the risks of having their operations, and fewer than half receiving care classed as ‘good’ or better. NHE speaks to NCEPOD’s Dr George Findlay.
‘K
nowing the risk’, the latest report by NCEPOD (the National Confidential
Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death), recommends the introduction of a UK- wide system to rapidly identify high-risk patients ahead of surgery.
All high-risk patients having elective sur- gery should be seen in a pre-assessment clinic, and they must be told of the mor- tality risk associated with their operation. Trusts must better cater for high-risk pa- tients and provide proper post-operative care, the report says.
Report co-author Dr George Findlay, NCE- POD clinical co-ordinator and intensive care consultant, said there is a real lack of understanding among clinicians of the real risks of surgery for some patients.
He said: “It’s not just the risk of death and complications, but also the effect that has on patients’ length of stay and resource utilisation. If you talk to clinicians as we have been doing, and talk to surgeons, they don’t really have a true appreciation of the risk that some of their patients face. We therefore don’t really do the right thing for those patients, and so they stay in hospital an awful lot longer, they do badly, and they use lots more bed days than they need to.
“If we got the system working better, there would be so much more capacity to treat patients. Maybe still not enough – we might need some additional resources to go in. But I couldn’t, with hand on heart, say that’s the root of the problem – the root is that the pathways aren’t right, the recog- nition of patient risk isn’t there, the man- agement of patients according to that level of risk isn’t there, and the result is an inef- ficient system that’s not good for patients.”
The report’s finding that high-risk patients do not get enough information about the potential risks of surgery got a lot of media attention, and Dr Findlay said they need to know.
He said: “It would be incredibly paternal- istic not to tell people what the chance of them dying from a procedure is. There are some patients who undergo surgery and it hastens their death, because the com- plication rate and mortality rate is high, whereas if they’d chosen not to have an
operation, whilst ultimately they will die, their time to dying may be longer. That’s really important.
“I’d be unhappy if we didn’t share informa- tion with patients about mortality risk, and also the likelihood of morbidity and poor outcomes. Many people undergo proce- dures deemed life-saving, and end up liv- ing another six or twelve months, but in a pretty debilitated, dependent state. When you speak to those patients, that’s not what they signed up to, or thought they signed up to – and not what they would have wanted.”
But getting a UK-wide system for identi- fying high-risk patients is not necessarily easy, depending as it does on the patient, the circumstances, and the surgery.
Dr Findlay said: “Some patients, hav- ing relatively minor surgery, say a hernia repair, may actually be very high-risk be- cause of underlying factors – their age, frailty, heart disease, lung disease – so it’s often a combination of things that makes somebody high-risk. Sometimes it’s easy to define – if you’re having an oesophagecto- my, or a major colonic resection, we know that puts you in a mortality group, even if you don’t look at any other facts.”
NCEPOD wants the medical Royal Colleges to come up with a UK-wide system to strat- ify risk. Dr Findlay said the ‘80-20’ rule applies – about 80% of high-risk patients are easy to identify based on their surgery or underlying conditions, but around 20% can slip through the net and not get the proper care or information.
Dr Findlay said the onus is on Trusts to im- prove things, and that they need to exam- ine their data on procedures and patient outcomes to identify patients likely to do badly, die, or have long lengths of stay.
He said: “They need to focus on pathways of care for those people. Each hospital must identify high-risk patients and come up with a plan to deliver appropriate care for those people and quantify it, and pass that onto the Trust board or chief executive so they are aware of the responsibilities of the organisation.”
The real worry is that things may actually be getting worse.
Dr Findlay explained: “If you look at emer- gency NCEPOD theatre provision, there’s less now than there was a few years ago, and our feeling is that as Trusts are more focused on delivering elective waiting times targets, they may be taking their eyes off the ball on emergency provision.
“We are concerned about emergency high- risk patients – if you have an intra-abdom- inal operation as an emergency, 1 in 4 peo- ple are dead within 30 days, for example.
“Patients may be get- ting a worse deal be- cause of the focus on delivering elective tar- gets, and the fact that everyone’s so con- strained financially.”
Dr George Findlay
FOR MORE INFORMATION The report is at
www.ncepod.org.uk
national health executive Jan/Feb 12 | 65
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84