Feature Industrial buildings Top tips to negotiating leases
The economic uncertainties have impacted upon most sectors making it difficult for a business to plan for anything other than its short-term requirements. Manufacturing is no different and without confidence in a stable order book or an otherwise attractive pipeline, many prospective manufacturer tenants are reluctant to commit to what they perceive to be inflexible, long term and expensive leases. David Fanchi, a partner at Thomas Eggar legal firm looks into the issue of negotiating leases
M
anufactuers’ hesitance has created a problem for land- lords, many of whom are highly leveraged and rely upon a stable rental income from their properties to service the borrowing they have secured against them. In addition to an income stream, a further issue of which investor landlords are all too aware, is the underlying value of their investment. That value can diminish over time, especially towards the expiry of the lease or the date on which a tenant can exercise a break. In many circumstances demand for leases is currently being outstripped by supply, so landlords are anxious to attract tenants. Similarly landlords with tenants in place under leases that could soon expire (or when tenants’ break clauses are approaching) are often prepared to listen to requests for an incentive not to vacate. These incentives can take many forms, but common examples are rent free peri- ods, capital payments, and agreements about future dilapidations liabilities or a longer term reduction in rent. Andy Gibbs, an associate and head of business space based in the Southampton office of leading real estate advisory firm Vail Williams LLP, says that tenants should take the opportunity to consider the value of any break clause in their leases,
especially if they are aware that they will not be exercising it as the landlord may be prepared to ‘buy back’ the break right. Gibbs recently negotiated a payment of £350,000 to one of his clients in return for giving up a break right in a lease of a 20,000 sq ft unit. Many manufacturers find that their space requirements change over time, but, like tenants in all other sectors, wait until the end of the lease to con- sider moving to more suitable premises. Gibbs says, “moving is not the only option. In order to keep you in the property landlords could be sur- prisingly accommodating. By explor- ing the options with a landlord, a tenant may well find there is now flex- ibility that they did not think existed.” When it comes to negotiating a new lease, either when considering a renewal or a lease of new premises, the message from the market to tenants is to ensure to ask for what you want. While it is true to say that landlords remain keen for lease durations to be reasonably lengthy, a tenant who agrees to take a long lease should explore the availability of regular break options and whether a dis- counted or stepped rent could be agreed in return. This is particularly important for a growing manufacturer whose requirements for space are con- stantly evolving. It is also important
Above left: David Fanchi is a partner in the legal firm Thomas Eggar
for a tenant to ensure that any lease, other than a very short term lease, con- tains provisions that allow the lease to be assigned or the premises to be sub- let without the landlord attaching onerous conditions to the same. This will allow a tenant to transfer the lease to a willing third party, or at least sublet any surplus space within the premises in the event that the tenant cannot part with the lease.
Loading canopy provides cover for people and freight T
he opening of a further depot for transport and logistics Company Geodis Calberson in the Black Country has resulted in them
purchasing a large 450 square meter loading canopy from Spaciotempo. Handling freight from a wide range of businesses, the Smethwick based depot needed a solution to extend the operating space while protecting goods from the predictably inclement British weather. Bruce McLellan, regional commercial manager at Geodis Calberson,
was recommended to Spaciotempo by one of their subsidiary companies. He says: “The canopy is absolutely the right solution for us. It has given us a large protected area for trucks and ensures that the goods and the people involved in the loading and unloading process stay dry. From the initial enquiry in late summer to the final installation in October I have been impressed with Spaciotempo’s speed of response. The company has been able to provide a very quick solution for us in line with our growth plans.” Spaciotempo
T: 01889 569569 14
www.spaciotempo.co.uk Enter 313
In some circumstances, tenants will wish to ensure that their lease is termi- nated as soon as possible where that space is surplus to their requirements. The reality of the market means that if the landlord thinks it cannot obtain a new letting quickly and on acceptable terms, it may look for a reason to argue that the tenant has not validly ended the lease. Tenants must therefore be aware of not only when their leases can be brought to an end but, equally importantly, whether they need to take any steps to facilitate this. For exam- ple, a lease could contain precondi- tions to a break clause which may make it difficult to implement the break without sufficient planning. As well as the possibility of contrac- tual restrictions on termination, statute may also regulate how and when a tenant can terminate. Some leases of business premises in England and Wales are affected by an Act of Parliament that was passed in 1954. This imposes a statutory framework, which may apply to termination of a lease (both at the end of the term and on a break date) in addition to any requirements in the lease. If a tenant does not abide by all of the termina- tion requirements then it is at risk that the lease with all of its inherent liabili- ties will continue.
It is therefore crucial for tenants to properly understand both the contrac- tual and statutory termination provi- sions and procedures that will apply to them when their leases end. Thomas Eggar T: 01635 571077
david.fanchi@thomsaeggar.com Enter 312 JANUARY 2012 Factory Equipment
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48