This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
| PRIME PRoMotIon


was a slightly increased tendency for swelling during the initial phase. There were no subsequent complications. In the author’s view, this substance represents an interesting development in the field of fillers.


Injection technique Varioderm Subdermal was injected in 80% of the patients using 18 and 20 gauge cannulae, and a 26 gauge needle in 20% of patients. The injection technique began with horizontal injections from the edge of the malar bone forward towards the nose and strictly inferior to the orbital rim. It is important to avoid any large boluses; to make the injection easier, the skin must be stretched in the opposite direction to the point of injection (Figure 1).


Clinical trials The latest development of HA-based Varioderm products is a highly cross-linked HA (up to 80% cross linking grade), which has no suspension at all and still has the best injectability profile. Varioderm Subdermal, a newly developed HA-based soft tissue filler from Adoderm, was studied between 2007 and 2010. A total of 108 patients were treated for a range of indications. The product comprises


27 mg/ml of cross-linked


Varioderm Subdermal, which has the highest concentration of dermal filler currently available worldwide.


Injected sites Varioderm Subdermal was injected in subcutaneous soft tissue using a 26 gauge needle and blunt cannula (18 or 20 gauge). Careful injection using the fanning and tunnelling technique is necessary to prevent any irregularities or palpable mass. Subcutaneous injections of Varioderm Subdermal


were mostly used for the treatment of deep nasolabial and marionette folds, cheeks, cheek bones and chin augmentation (Table 1). It is also possible to perform the injection at the supra-periosteal plane. The injection pressure was acceptable and acute reactions such as swelling, reddening and pain were either minimal, or did not occur. A pronounced volume effect and good adaptation to the tissue were observed, so that even very pronounced folds could be augmented. No complications were noticed either in the short-term or during check-ups after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, with


Figure 1 Injection technique


Table 1. Injected sites Region


Cheeks and malar enhancement


Nasal bridge and tip


Malar and nasolabial fold Tear trough and chin


Number of patients (%)


43 (39.8)


22 (20.4) 41 (37.9) 2 (1.90)


prime-journal.com | October 2011 ❚


63


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84