HYDRONICS FROM THE FIELD
efficient design. We have worked together on multiple projects over the last few years, on everything from small remodels and additions to energy retrofits and new construction projects. As described in last month’s column, we even retrofitted a new mechanical system in David’s house. David said that he had a unique new project and asked
Passive house, anyone? Part 1 A
BY DAN FOLEY CONTRIBUTING WRITER
little over a year ago, I received a phone call from David Peabody, an Alexandria, Va.-based architect (
www.greenhaus.org) who specializes in energy
whether I would be interested. Without asking any questions, I answered “Yes,” trusting his lead. Little did I know what I was getting myself into: David was designing the first certified passive house to be constructed in the Mid-Atlantic region. My first reaction was to think “passive solar.” I recalled
32
two passive solar houses that I “fixed” in the late ’80s by installing boilers and a combination of fan coils, radiators and radiant. One that I recall distinctly and that I still service today had rooms that would not get above 50 F in January. The passive solar did not kick in until late May or early June. (I digress; this project has little to do with solar.) Once again, my initial reaction was wrong. David took the time to educate me on the passive
house movement, which began in Germany approximately 20 years ago. The basic premise is to build a super-tight, super insulated building envelope to greatly reduce and minimize the size and capacity of the heating system. “Great,” I thought, “this guy wants to put me out of business.” My limited capacity for looking beyond the next 15 minutes had struck once again.
Stringent requirements What I quickly learned was that mechanical system
design is critical to the function and operation of a passive house. In order to be certified, passive houses must meet the following strict criteria: •The tight building envelope must have less than .6 air
changes per hour (ACH) @ 50 Pascals as measured by a blower door test. •Annual heating requirements must be less than 4,746
Btu/sq. ft. annually. •Primary energy usage (electricity, DHW, heating)
must be less than 38,100 Btu/sq. ft. annually. Other recommendations regarding window U-values,
ventilation and thermal bridging vary with the climate. Suffice it to say that these houses are airtight, super- insulated and have three-pane glazed, insulated windows.
that fit right in with the 1930s vintage neighborhood in Bethesda, Md., where the house was being built. There was very little to distinguish this as a passive house just by looking at it. The details were in the skeleton. The basement had a full 4” perimeter insulation and 6” of slab insulation. The wall structure consisted of 71/2" thick SIP (structural insulated panel) panels with another 2" of foam board under the finish element. The windows were a triple-glazed, insulated frame model special ordered from Canada. The roof structure consisted of 12" thick SIP panels. Thermal bridging was eliminated. Every gap or crack was sealed, caulked or insulated. No one was allowed to drill or puncture the building envelope. All penetrations had to be scheduled and submitted to the architect and builder for approval. Once approved, the hole was drilled by the general contractor (GC) and sealed by the GC, after the pipe or cable penetration was run. This house was tight! The house was being built on spec by O’Neill
A passive house needn’t look like a space-age concept or an igloo. All of this home’s energy-saving details are under its traditional-style siding.
Development Corporation, Gaithersburg, Md. Brendan O’Neill Jr. was the project manager. We held multiple planning meetings with the architect, GC and other trade subs. Everyone had to understand the concept of a passive house and be aboard or this would not work. It was imperative that we coordinated our work and were aware of what everyone else was doing or it would quickly devolve into a disaster. Peabody and O’Neill were the ringleaders that kept this project going in the right direction.
Astounding results After I reviewed the plans, I did the takeoffs and
performed a load calculation. I had to manually enter most of the data, since most of the building envelope structures were not in the dropdown menus provided by the load calculation software. At first, I did not believe the results: Heat loss for the 4,600 sq. ft. structure was less than 24,000 Btu at design conditions or approximately 5 Btu/sq. ft. Keep in mind that we see design conditions for relatively few hours annually. The majority of the heating load hours are at partial load. I found these results absolutely amazing. I wanted to incorporate radiant floor heating in my
“David took the time to educate me on the passive house movement, which began in Germany approximately 20 years ago. The basic premise is to build a super-tight, super insulated building envelope to greatly reduce and minimize the size and capacity of the heating system.”
We reviewed the architectural drawings for this
structure. I expected either some space-age design with exotic materials or a boring Igloo cooler box-like structure with tiny windows. This project was neither. The architecture was a traditional American Foursquare design
design, but this was vetoed by the architect. Radiant was not necessary as MRT (mean radiant temperature) is maintained at a comfortable level by the utter lack of heat loss through the structure. This will have to be proven to me, as I am still not sold on this idea. The house is wired with sensors and data-loggers, so we will see what happens next winter. Mechanical ventilation is critical in such a tight house. This system runs 24/7 to ventilate the
structure, bringing in fresh air while exhausting stale air. The exhaust points, return air and supply duct locations, as well as the ventilation duct penetrations, were carefully detailed with the architect and GC. e Turn to FOLEY on p 43
phc june 2011
www.phcnews.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88