search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
He’s predicted every winner for 40 years.


Professor Holds Keys to White House


BY MARISA HERMAN A


llan lichtman has accurately predicted the winner of nearly every U.S. presiden- tial race since 1984, and, this year, he is sticking to his tried-


and-tested system: Ignore polls and pundits.


Instead, the American University


professor uses a method he developed known as the 13 Keys to the White House. His keys are indicating Joe Biden is going to win again this year. So Lichtman is encouraging Dem-


ocrats to stick with the President as their candidate, despite his low poll numbers and cognitive decline be- cause he doesn’t want to “turn” ad- ditional keys, including losing the incumbency, that would cause the Democrats to be defeated. As for the polls, Lichtman


calls them “mere snapshots” that can’t predict election out- comes because they have large error margins. He called them “useless” in forecasting winners because


66 NEWSMAX | AUGUST 2024


their guesses have no “scientific ba- sis.”


He says his keys provide a better


look into how presidential elections “really work” because the model is based on the strength and perfor- mance of the incumbent. Since creating the keys system, he


has made 10 predictions for U.S. presi- dential elections and all have been correct — with the small exception of the 2000 race that was so close it had to be decided by the Supreme Court. (Lichtman accurately predicted that Al Gore would win the popular vote.) Creating an election-predicting


model wasn’t something Lichtman was actively seeking when he was a distinguished visiting scholar at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena in 1981. It came about when he crossed


paths with Soviet seismologist Vladi- mir Keilis-Borok, who used his system of mathematical pat- terns to predict earthquakes to forecast election outcomes. Keilis-Borok had developed


LICHTMAN


a fascination with elections — a foreign concept for Soviets — when he visited Washing-


ton, D.C., in 1963 as part of a scientific delegation involved in negotiating the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Together, they reconceptualized


elections in “geophysical terms.” That meant in 1981, the election wasn’t “Jimmy Carter vs. Ronald Reagan,” or “Democrat vs. Republican,” or “lib- eral vs. conservative.” Rather, it was looked through the


lens of “stability,” which meant the White House party keeps power or “earthquake,” in which the White House party is defeated. They studied every presidential


election from 1860 and developed the theory that it is primarily governance — not campaigning — that counts. They crafted the 13 keys associated with “stability” and “earthquake.” The keys are phrased as questions


where an answer of “true” always fa- vors the reelection of the sitting presi- dent. Under the system, if he or she loses


six of the “keys,” they are predicted to lose the election. With the new system, Lichtman


made his first prediction in April 1982 in the Washingtonian Magazine, where he correctly forecasted Rea-


WHITE HOUSE/GLOWIMAGES/GETTY IMAGES / LICHTMAN/ TOM WILLIAMS/GETTY IMAGES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100