Community safety
give owners of multi occupancy buildings the information they need to keep residents safe. It cannot be emphasised enough that all of
the relevant parts of the Building Regulations should be incorporated within one doorset. This means that the specification for the tested doorset should be the same and should include all relevant Approved Documents, such as Approved Document B (fire) and ADQ (security). We have seen so many doorsets now for which the specification as tested for fire is not the same as the specification as tested for security.
Expert panel
The Grenfell Technical Group is due to report to the Grenfell Independent Expert Panel, also chaired by Sir Ken Knight, which is made up of a range of building and fire safety experts from a number of organisations, including the Building Research Establishment and the National Fire Chiefs Council. This panel seeks to help the government
ascertain if any immediate actions need to be taken on any fire and safety issues in high rise buildings. For example, it will consider whether changes or clarifications are required to existing regulations, and provide advice on possible changes, including making recommendations on the use of specific materials. In addition, it will look at whether the current process for assuring fire and building safety in high rise buildings, including through the building control process, is fit for purpose, and whether any immediate changes are required.
Assuring performance
Landlords who are seeking assurance that existing doorsets meet the current benchmark standards should seek professional advice. This may include submitting a sample doorset or door assembly to a test laboratory that is accredited by the UK Accreditation Service (UKAS) or via a suitably qualified third party accreditation body that is a signatory to the European Accreditation Multilateral Agreement (EA MLA). A technical assessment must be based on
appropriate, relevant and applicable primary fire resistance test evidence from one or more full scale fire resistance tests. In considering whether to replace existing doorsets, landlords should consult the Local Government Association guidance, Fire safety in purpose-built blocks of flats1
FOCUS
an applicable independent third party product certification scheme. This would provide assurance that it meets
current building regulations and has been manufactured under a third party certificated quality assurance system, with certification provided by a UKAS accredited certification body. Replacement doorsets should be installed by a third party certificated installer and the doorsets maintained throughout the life of the doorset.
Once all the information and advice has
been received following the Grenfell tragedy, the government may decide to make changes to the Building Regulations. As far as SBD and the fire service are concerned, we have proved that fire and security can work well together and that the technical challenges have been overcome by a number of leading manufacturers. We do not believe that there is a conflict between fire and security, and in residential multi occupancy blocks of flats, SBD continues to require all entrance doorsets to flats to be dual certified for fire and security
John Cole is chief operating officer at Secured by Design. For more information, view page 5
Reference 1.
www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/ documents/fire-safety-purpose-built- 04b.pdf
, which advises landlords wishing to replace
the complete doorset to the front door of a flat that they should be certified in accordance with
Please note that this article was written before publication of the government’s anticipated best practice guidance on the replacement of front entrance doorsets.
www.frmjournal.com JUNE 2018 25
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64