COMPANY PROFILE
locations across the UK, or export it abroad using its established trade routes.
This is a sector currently under some scrutiny. A gap in the way clinical waste is disposed of was highlighted last year when investigations were launched into clinical waste operator Healthcare Environmental Services (HES). It followed claims that hundreds of tonnes of medical waste had built up at some sites in England and Scotland.
The firm ceased trading before Christmas with the loss of around 400 jobs. Events revealed an apparent lack of high temperature incinerators similar to those now being planned by Clinitek, capable of coping with clinical waste – including body parts – from hospitals.
Starting out
With consistent demand from European customers seeking waste for hungry CHP plants, the business could possibly have just sat back and let the work continue to roll in.
However, the company recently announced it is now moving into the hazardous and clinical waste sector; a development which means it will become the sole supplier for a new hazardous waste incinerator business, Clinitek, which is part of energy plant developer AssetGen Partners.
“
The move will see Andusia link up with clinical and hazardous waste disposal specialists currently working with hospitals and other hazardous waste producers. It will then offer a new destination for their waste, Clinitek’s five new high temperature hazardous and clinical waste incinerator plants at various
Veterans of the waste industry with around 40 years of experience between them, Steve and partner Stewart had been scouting for a joint venture that would enable them to combine their considerable expertise. Steve was self- employed as a consultant; Stewart was at the helm of a small recycling business and the UK’s RDF export market was in its infancy.
Then, a client with packaging to dispose of which he did not want to send to landfill got Steve thinking of waste-to- energy (WtE) solutions.
He looked at the cement energy market, where cement production is made more efficient by burning biomass waste as opposed to fossil fuels, and the heat of the production process is used to generate electricity.
However, the market in the UK was small. It was while Steve attended the annual RWM conference that he heard of combined heat and power plants in Europe – particularly the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden and Norway – which were desperate for a source of waste material.
Now, seven years on – and apart from its impact on the pound, relatively unperturbed by Brexit – he senses yet another potential new market.
“We hear a lot of comments asking why we don’t use this waste material in the UK, and why it’s being exported,” he said. “But in the early days of this, it was landfill waste and Europe was a lot further ahead than the UK.
“Some countries in Europe had a landfill ban which meant incinerators were a core part of waste management. In Scandinavia, the bedrock of the country is granite, so there’s not a lot of landfill.
“But now we’re seeing investors building more incineration plants here.”
Clean energy
Pollution once linked with burning waste is no longer an issue, he points out. “People see incinerators as bad, but the choice is ‘incinerate or landfill’ because you can’t recycle everything.
“The technology has grown and developed so that all that comes out of a WtE plant is vapour; it’s not smoke.
“It’s not a dirty system,” he stressed. “It’s a significant step up from landfill, where waste goes in land and rots away over a thousand years. It’s a lot more environmentally sound.
“We’re confident the market will evolve in the UK,” he adds. “I can see us being significantly bigger in three or four years.”
www.andusia.co.uk
People see incinerators as bad, but the choice is ‘incinerate or landfill’ because you can’t recycle everything.
SHWM March, 2019 41
“
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64