search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The DTF Column


Has NUR won the race to the powderless moon?


Powderless DTF ink is making strong headway through three different avenues, but which is best? Colin Marsh, CEO of Resolute, has given his two cents on the matter.


F


or several years, powderless DTF has been talked about as the next major development in direct to film printing. Removing adhesive powder promises cleaner production, improved print quality, softer transfers and a simpler workflow. The concept, however, is far from new.


Resolute first introduced powderless DTF printing almost seven years ago. At the time, the technology worked predominantly with polyester fabrics. Producing a commercially viable solution for cotton proved considerably more challenging, and the lack of flexibility ultimately prevented wider adoption.


We continued development rather than abandoning the concept and have since been involved in testing no fewer than five different powderless DTF ink technologies.


Today, three approaches stand out: DuPont’s P1600 jettable adhesive, NUR Ink’s two-part white ink system and a new Chinese-developed single white ink containing the adhesive within the ink itself.


DuPont: A different approach to adhesive DuPont’s P1600 technology uses a separate jettable adhesive rather than a combination in the white ink. While technically impressive, there are practical considerations for commercial transfer producers.


Firstly, the adhesive is transparent, making it difficult to visually inspect its coverage on the reverse of the transfer. More importantly, according to reports from multiple tests, the jettable adhesive cannot be fully cured before pressing because it needs to reactivate during the heat-pressing process. This presents a challenge for businesses producing transfers for storage or shipping to customers for pressing later. Currently, the prints require pressing within 24 hours of production or on the fly when used in an automated system called the Stomper.


NUR takes a two-part route


NUR Ink has approached the powderless DTF transfer process differently by developing a two-part white ink system. The colours are printed first, followed by Part A and Part B, all within a single automated printing pass. The resulting powderless transfer can then be fully cured, rolled, stored or shipped before being heat pressed onto the garment.


NUR currently specifies a 45-second heat press time coupled with hot peel film, the shortest of the three powderless technologies. The inks are competitively priced and manufactured at dual locations, helping reduce exposure to potential supply-chain disruption.


The NUR system also allows for hybrid transfer production; should you need to use a specialist adhesive powder, this can be done by simply switching on the powder hopper on the hybrid


www.printwearandpromotion.co.uk finishing unit coupled with the DTF Printer.


Could a single white ink change everything? The third technology is currently undergoing development in China and potentially offers the simplest route to powderless production. Instead of separate adhesive or two-part white channels, the adhesive is incorporated directly into a single white ink. Potentially, this could allow a compatible DTF printer with a white ink print head to create powderless transfers without modification. Early print and wash testing has been extremely positive, although the system currently requires the longest heat-pressing time of the three leading technologies.


Solving DTF’s hand-feel problem


Traditional adhesive powder contributes to the characteristic hand feel associated with many DTF transfers. Removing powder produces a noticeably softer result while maintaining excellent image quality.


In Resolute’s testing, all powderless prints have demonstrated a quality and feel comparable to DTG, while the NUR system has also delivered impressive wash durability.


For garment decorators wanting the production advantages and versatility of DTF without the heavier feel sometimes associated with conventional transfers, this represents an important step forward.


Future-proofing DTF


Most existing six-head DTF printers with two white ink feeds can use this new powderless technology, while continuing to print with CMYK or CMYKRGBO inks, providing an exceptionally wide colour gamut alongside powderless production.


Other manufacturers will undoubtedly follow as demand develops. But right now, of the technologies tested, NUR appears to have officially won the first stage of the powderless race to the moon.


November 2026 | 45 | Print using powderless DTF ink


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68