search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Feature: Electronic design


the standing current of the common-base transistors of the Figure 10 folded cascode TIS, must each be biased to provide at least as much quiescent current as the TIS’s tail current established by transistors Q23 and Q25. Tis is necessary to prevent one of the common-base transistors Q16 and Q17 from being prematurely starved of current when the TIS’s tail current swings entirely from one transistor of its differential pair to the other. For the same reason, the standing current provided by sources Q34 and Q36 in the TIS of Figure 13 must at least each be equal to the quiescent current provided by each of the TIS’s tail sources Q38 and Q39.


Figure 7: The bases of the complementary output transistors are connected to the low-impedance outputs of complementary cross-coupled emitter-followers in a futile attempt to differentially drive the output devices


Compromise Te circuits of Figures 4, 7, 8 and 9 are effectively single voltage gain stage designs which do not maximise forward-path gain or improve forward-path linearity enough to justify their use. Te best compromise is obtained by adopting a two-stage design, consisting of a transadmittance stage driving a transimpedance stage, with each stage designed to generate as much forward-path gain as possible. A modest amount of local (minor loop) negative feedback is then applied to each stage to enhance forward-path linearity and promote stability of the major negative feedback loop, without excessively reducing the forward-path gain necessary for adequate major loop gain. As noted previously, the forward-path


Figure 8: A cosmetic variation on the scheme of Figure 7


transimpedance gain of the second stage of a two-stage amplifier is approximately equal to the product of its current gain and the effective impedance at its output. Terefore, it may at first appear that increasing the second stage’s forward-path transimpedance gain is a simple matter of either increasing its current gain by making it a compound configuration of an emitter-follower driving a common emitter stage, or increasing the effective impedance at its output by making it a cascode. In practice, however, the extent to which the output impedance of the TIS can be maximised by using a cascode is severely limited by the input impedance of the buffer to which the TIS is connected, and only approaches a maximum when the output of the TIS is connected to the input of a Class-A MOSFET source follower. A far more significant increase in the


50 December 2021/January 2022 www.electronicsworld.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66