search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DS-APR22-PG18_Layout 1 31/03/2022 13:16 Page 1


FEATURE MACHINE BUILDING, FRAMEWORKS & SAFETY


For many years, hydraulic and


pneumatic actuation has been used on


servo press systems. In recent years, however, industry has been


switching to the new generation of


electromechanical


actuators. Here, Kistler explains why


F


or many years, interference fit has been used as a simple and reliable method of joining two components of a sub-assembly,


typically on automobile transmission and gearbox assembly lines where gears, bearings and bushes are pressed onto shafts. Historically, hydraulic actuation has been used for interference fit operations, with pneumatic actuators or mechanical cams being used for low force applications. But, once such systems are installed for a particular operation, changes can be time consuming and expensive. More recently, industry has been using the


new generation of electromechanical actuators in order to take advantage of the cost savings of around 77% over hydraulic and 90% over pneumatic systems. These savings accrue from increased productivity, lower maintenance and greatly reduced energy costs, and result in a very short payback period in the majority of applications. Furthermore, as they need only an electrical supply, the risk of work space contamination is eliminated.


fLExIbILITy


The key to increased productivity is the reduction or, in many cases, the elimination of rejects due to the precision and ease with which the whole process may be monitored and controlled in real time. Kistler's electromechanical Servo Press Systems have integrated sensors to allow efficient analysis for comprehensive process monitoring and the documentation of all measurement values. The electromechanical actuators from Kistler


include both force sensors and rotary encoders to measure and control the operation, with the actuator linked to a servo controller and a program/monitor unit. This makes it possible to accurately specify a series of force, position and speed combinations which clearly define a number of steps in a process. A position repeatability of <0.01mm is possible


and, for some applications, force feedback may be used to provide a level of control greatly exceeding that of hydraulic or pneumatic systems. In addition, the control program can


18 DESIGN SOLUTIONS APRIL 2022 SWITCHING TO


ELECTROMECHANICAL ACTUATION


Two Kistler NCFN Type 2153A servo press units used in this application allow riveting of up to 20 types of lightweight brake disks


be easily changed, allowing electromechanical actuators to be used on a different press fit operation in a different location, making the system both flexible and cost effective.


THE bENEfITS


Electromechanical actuators require very little maintenance, typically less than one man-hour per actuator per year, whereas hydraulic and pneumatic systems, which demand fixed pipework and compressors, need regular servicing. In the case of the hydraulic systems, additional maintenance costs are incurred by the need to change the hydraulic fluid at regular intervals and the safe disposal of the used oil. Although the initial investment into electrical


technology is greater than hydraulic or pneumatic technology, there are other important factors besides the initial investment. The Kistler Servo Press design is compact and low weight, meaning it is easy and inexpensive to install, and is ideal for interfacing with robotic systems. For example, a 15kN actuator module is just 520mm long, with a mass of 17kg, and can be easily relocated should the need arise. This therefore provides flexibility in the design of the manufacturing process. In addition, the electromechanical system is significantly quieter and cleaner than hydraulic or pneumatic systems which can be a major environmental advantage. All manufacturing companies are seeking lower energy consumption to lower production


costs and minimise impact on the environment. Installed in place of hydraulic or pneumatic systems for press-fit applications, electromechanical actuators can generate significant energy cost savings, which deliver rapid cost recovery, improved working conditions and reduced pollution. Electromechanical systems use energy only


when performing pressing operations, do not use oil and have very low maintenance requirements. A press-fit production line using Kistler electromechanical Servo Press System actuators can generate savings from lower energy consumption and reduced operating and maintenance costs, to give a payback period of as little as eighteen months. Electromechanical Servo Press Systems also


offer versatility – even a manufacturing process with a relatively small number of press-fit operations can benefit from the installation of a simple, low cost, electromechanical system which will quickly pay for itself. The combination of higher productivity, easy


installation, low maintenance and minimum energy consumption, combined with better working conditions, make installing a Kistler Servo Press System a real world win-win situation, the company concludes.


Kistler Instruments T: 01256 741550 www.kistler.com/en/


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58