The popularity of Power over Ethernet (PoE) is set to continue, with great strides being made in power output. However, it is essential to understand the critical impact of heat generation and consequently the need for heat management when

designing and installing PoE cable networks, as Zoran Borcic, Draka global product manager Datacom, explains


ower over Ethernet (PoE) transmits power and data over a single cable,

with PoE injectors or switches/hubs serving as the power source. Originally developed to power classic telephones, PoE is ideal for remote devices such as webcams, surveillance cameras or WLAN access points installed in inaccessible places. It is, however, also becoming increasingly important in other areas as well: Internet of Things (IoT), smart office and residential cabling, and many network-compatible devices in offices and industry. In fact the number of PoE-capable ports

has tripled in the past five years, with network cables that can transmit more and more power driving the trend.

POE STANDARDS All cable categories from Cat.5e to Cat 8.2 support the PoE standard 802.3af, at and bt. Two variants are available for the transmission of energy between the energy supply (Power Supply Equipment, PSE) and the energy consumer (Powered Device, PD). The spare pair procedure uses only the free wire pairs 4/5 and 7/8 for the power supply between PSE and PD. With phantom power, the voltage is supplied via all wire pairs, which are also used for data transmission. This means that the current flow is over the data line. The latest standard, IEEE 802.3bt,

specifies the maximum achievable power over four-pair PoE, at between 72 and 90 watts. Thanks to this higher performance, even larger end devices, for example IP TV devices in Full HD, can now be supplied with energy via a data cable. Cable manufacturers are continuously working to further develop the PoE performance of network data cables, recognising the limited power output that the PoE process entails is still the biggest shortcoming to the wider adoption of the technology. However, it’s not the only challenge.

One key area that needs careful attention when it comes to PoE cable networks is heat management.

CHANGING TEMPERATURES The maximum operating ambient


temperatures of PoE cables is 60˚C and the components 50˚C. The addition of electricity means an increased load for the cable/link/channel, which usually results in increasing cable bundle temperature. The greater power a data cable delivers, the more heat is generated in the cable. It is a cable’s ohmic resistance that generates heat, 25Ω/100m being the maximum channel. In addition, the bundle size and installation environment directly influence the cable’s heat dissipation, leading to significant temperature increase. Furthermore, a channel which includes two/three patch cords with smaller conductors (higher resistance) than the cable could lead to the possibility of even higher temperatures being generated. The type of cable pathways used is a

decisive consideration here: grid cable pathway, perforated cable system or

When planning for PoE applications, heat management of the cable channel must be a top consideration. To achieve optimum performance, the total heating effect from power loss versus heat dissipation must not, combined, exceed 10°C

completely closed duct pathway made of plastic will have significantly different effects on temperature. Continual heating and cooling over

time will change the cable’s performance, frequently decreasing transmission properties and softening the insulation material, leading to loss of associated permanent structural symmetry. Replacing a patch cord with a product that is smaller in copper size and/or increased in length could change the stability of the bundle/installation, or even the whole system. Heat build-up over a PoE channel can

also negatively impact the connectivity components – there is a real risk that if disconnected under load a spark can be generated which could destroy contacts.

HEAT MANAGEMENT When planning for PoE applications, heat management of the cable channel must therefore be a top consideration. To achieve optimum performance, the total heating effect from power loss versus heat dissipation must not, combined, exceed 10˚C. To maintain this operating limit, the power loss must be reduced, or the heat dissipation increased. Clearly power loss is undesirable (this can be addressed by using a cable with a larger conductor diameter, which improves the PoE range twofold), so heat dissipation should be a major focus when designing and installing cabling systems. Key factors which influence the heat

dissipation include bundle size, shielding, patch-cords and air flow. Smaller bundles are ideal, as are shielded cables as the metal of the shield helps to dissipate the heat generated inside (plus they allow greater flexibility in heat management at the design stage). Patch cords with a conductor of less than 26 AWG should always be avoided. Obviously, greater flowing air currents help keep temperatures down, so cable laid on open grille are preferential to closed duct.



RS Components (RS) has announced new additions to the range of Amphenol PowerLok connectors, with the compact PowerLok 300 Series completing the portfolio. The metal-shell PowerLok Series provides interconnect solutions and signal connections for EV and hybrid transportation applications. Accommodating up to four signal circuits and four power circuits, the connectors incorporate Amphenol’s RADSOK (RADial SOcKet) contact technology, which features a flat, high conductivity, alloy grid to provide robust, high-density contact to the mating pin. The 300 Series is for applications with cable current ratings of 150A, 200A, 250A or 300A, with models

available to accommodate corresponding cable sizes ranging from 35 to 95mm. There is the choice of keyed, straight or right-angled configurations, plus 360˚ shielding and environmental sealing options.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44