• • • cover story • • •

Electrical Compliance – quality and safety are being swept aside

by cost-cutting By Ian Carnall, managing director of Guardian Electrical Compliance Ltd


lectrical compliance is a legal requirement, as specified within the Electricity at Work

Regulations 1989 (EaWR). Unfortunately, far too many dutyholders see this an obligation that must be dealt with as quickly and cheaply as possible, leading to a corner cutting attitude to compliance. Maintaining a safe place of work in accordance

with the EaWR is not and never has been achieved by compiling records alone. The risk of an electrical fire, explosion or shock

has to some degree been relegated to a tick in the box by someone who may not have an electrical background. It is reprehensible that cost-saving is the priority over quality and safety throughout much of the industry in a bid to find the cheapest way of achieving electrical compliance. The resulting race to the bottom to offer the cheapest price has, without question, led to a serious decline in reporting standards.


IMPACT OF COMPLIANCE There is a dearth of readily available information regarding what constitutes a safe place of work, how to manage electrical reports and how to evidence the continuous monitoring and maintenance of electrical installations. This information is vital in providing a dutyholder with a defence in law, should there be a breach of the EaWR 1989, and this absence is one of the main reasons for the current indifference towards electrical compliance.


INTO SIMPLE LESSONS Guardian has gained an invaluable insight into the right approach to compliance through thousands of client appointments over a 25-year period, chairing regular client dutyholder meetings, delivering over 70 National Electrical Safety Seminars and currently advising a client base of over 2,500 end users. Electrical compliance requires serious focus and ongoing attention from a collaborative working

partnership between supplier and client. It should never be about simply uploading records to a server until the next time, be it three or five years. Indeed Regulation 4 (1) & (2) of EaWR 1989

states: As may be necessary to prevent danger, all systems, shall at all times be of such construction, so as not to give rise to danger: • All systems – from a battery to a power station •

All times – no days off, no respite

• Construction – designed, installed maintained and operated

The regulation is difficult, if not impossible to

comply with. However, paragraph 69 of EaWR 1989 does provide a solution and goes on to say, “records of maintenance, including test results, preferably kept throughout the working life of an electrical system will enable the condition of the equipment and the effectiveness of maintenance policies to be monitored. Without effective monitoring, dutyholders cannot be certain that the requirement for maintenance has been complied with.” The IET Wiring Regulations BS7671: 2018 Reg 652.2 goes on to mirror Paragraph 69 of EaWR 1989. Clearly, EaWR 1989 is calling for an effective

monitoring policy, not just a series of arbitrary tests at the mercy of a contractor who knows how to ‘complete’ electrical reports.


FOR GUIDANCE & ASSITANCE Hospitals have their Technical Memoranda (HTMs), Universities have something similar, but where is the help for the end user who needs guidance on practically discharging dutyholder responsibilities?

8 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING • JULY/AUGUST 2020 After all, whether electrically biased or not, it is

incumbent on the dutyholder under Regulation 3 of the EaWR 1989 to “comply with the provisions of the Electricity at Work Regulations 1989, in so far as matters which are within your CONTROL.” In other words, if you are in control for a particular aspect of electrical compliance, it is your responsibility.


LEGISLATION? For 30 years, dutyholders have had an EaWR memorandum of guidance on how to work safely on or near electrical equipment. Together with the current edition of BS7671 and the associated eight guidance notes, there is a basis for formulating a methodology for ensuring the electrical installation is safe to remain in service. Yet still there are gaping holes in basic legislative knowledge and quality of test records, leaving dutyholders unwittingly exposed, should there be an electrical incident leading to a breach of EaWR 1989. Guardian’s Complete Managed Compliance

Service has evolved over a 25-year period, Chastening experiences with the HSE have fundamentally shaped our business, so much so that we employed a former Senior Electrical Inspector from the HSE. As a consequence, this engendered a new focus when working with electricity from every department within our business. To find out more about Guardians’ approach to

‘Complete Managed Electrical Compliance’, we are holding a series of CPD accredited Breakfast Seminars throughout the UK. The Seminars will also look at how the latest technology via TraQit and QR Codes can ease the dutyholder burden of document control and achieve instant on-site access to current records and schedules. The first CPD accredited Breakfast Seminar we are scheduling for November 2020.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72