search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
a frequent cause of assignment failures, and they were the second most common reason for a failed assignment. “Employees or their families being to adapt to host locations


unable


remains a significant challenge, highlighting the importance of comprehensive support beyond financial packages,” the report said.


HOW CAN THE GLOBAL MOBILITY INDUSTRY RISE TO THE CHALLENGE? Another key finding was that costs were rising for both short and long term assignments, and that it was difficult for organisation to assess the value of sending senior staff abroad. It found that administrative costs for international assignments have increased since ECA’s previous survey, with average annual costs reaching USD 9,800 (EUR 9,200) per long-term assignment and USD 8,700 (EUR 8,200) per short- term assignment. “While larger programmes find efficiencies through technology and cost spreading, measuring return on investment remains problematic,” the survey said. Despite the potential time and


cost savings of implementing new technology and artificial intelligence (AI) into the mobility function, many organisations were not yet taking advantage of tech. In the survey, only 3 per cent of companies reported being fully satisfied with their mobility technology.


“Despite its recognised potential,


AI adoption in global mobility remains tentative, with only a small minority of companies having introduced AI into their processes so far,” the survey said.


WHAT ARE THE PRIORITIES & USES OF MOBILITY PROGRAMMES? “As global mobility continues to evolve, we are seeing organisations struggle to balance transactional and strategic responsibilities,” said Oliver Browne, Head of Content and Insights at ECA International. “With 60 per cent of respondents finding this balance challenging or very challenging, there is a clear need for more efficient processes and better technology integration to free up mobility professionals for more value-added work.”


THE BATTLE FOR GLOBAL TALENT CONTINUES IN 2025 The report shows how mobility teams deal with change on a daily basis, including a shift in organisational structures, new technology and different types of mobility. Yet global mobility is seen in a positive light and as an important solution to a lack of skills, as well as providing vital international experience and driving company growth. “It is no secret that international


Managing mobility – ECA Survey Report 2025 30


mobility is expensive, and cost issues are a significant challenge for global


mobility teams,” the report says. “This is why the corporate view of mobility in most companies focuses on where it can lead to growth and fill key skills gaps, rather than on training and cultural benefits.” The survey also found that


finding suitably skilled candidates for long-term international assignments remains challenging for many organisations. One solution to these difficulties lies in increasing the talent pool, with 42 per cent of companies implementing diversity policies to achieve this. ECA International’s survey


covered finance, engineering and tech. It looked at the challenges of cost management, technology adoption, talent acquisition, and strategic alignment with business objectives.


KEY FINDINGS OF THE ECA INTERNATIONAL REPORT Time pressures are real: Finding a balance between transactional and strategic work is an ongoing issue for GM teams. A trend toward automation: In


recent years, there has been a shift away from transactional work toward a more strategic focus, enabled by an increased usage of automation. Global mobility is increasingly


important for business development: While more companies now report an even split between strategic and transactional work, the future suggests a move further toward strategic work taking precedence.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74