OPINION


WHY THE LASER INDUSTRY KEEPS CALLING EVOLUTION “INNOVATION” AN OPINION PIECE BY ADRIAN WRIGHT, KIMLA FIBRE LASER SPECIALIST AT DALTONS WADKIN


are well understood. Yet adoption remains low. UK data show that only a small proportion of manufacturers have implemented AI in production environments. The challenge is not engineering capability, but confidence, coordination, and commercial clarity.


APPLIED INNOVATION DELIVERS REAL VALUE


Early in my career, I worked for an international machine-solution provider that developed what was, at the time, a striking piece of automation. On paper, it was innovative, in practice, it struggled. The system assumed ideal operating conditions that rarely existed on real shop floors and the machine was eventually withdrawn. That experience has stayed with me for more than twenty years, because it highlights a challenge that still exists in manufacturing today: the gap between conceptual innovation and practical value.


INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENT, NOT TRANSFORMATION


Industry headlines would have us believe that manufacturing, and laser processing in particular, is in the middle of a golden age. Yet when you look closely at what has actually changed on the shop floor, the picture is more reserved.


Fibre lasers reduced operating costs and energy consumption, electric punching replaced hydraulics, press brakes moved towards hybrid and fully electric platforms. These were all important developments, making machines leaner, greener, and more reliable. But fundamentally, they performed the same tasks in much the same way.


Margins have improved for machine owners, but the broader impact on productivity, integration, and overall workflow efficiency has been limited. The industry has progressed but


16 | LASER USER 119 MARCH 2026


largely through incremental refinement rather than genuine transformation.


THE ILLUSION OF INNOVATION


Most OEMs quite rightly focus on continuous improvement. However, the industry has fallen into a familiar pattern. One manufacturer introduces a feature, and within a year or two, competitors catch up and the market resets. What is often presented as innovation is, in reality, competitive convergence.


Automation illustrates this clearly. While fully automated laser cutting cells exist, many subcontractors still load and unload manually. This is not resistance to change, but a reflection of economic reality. In low-volume, high-mix environments, the return on investment for full automation often does not stack up. Where automation is adopted, it is usually partial and processes remain fragmented.


THE MISSING LINK: INTEGRATION


The most significant limitation today is not machine capability, but system connectivity. The industry has focused on building better individual machines rather than better integrated workflows. Meaningful productivity gains will not come from marginal increases in cutting speed, but from improved flow of data and material across the entire operation.


The required technologies already exist. AI-assisted programming, automated nesting, intelligent scheduling and traceability tools


Some of the most effective innovations are not radical, but practical. This is often where innovation delivers the greatest value: in the intelligent application of existing tools to real manufacturing problems.


Looking ahead, AI’s most immediate impact in laser processing is likely to be in programming, scheduling, and optimisation rather than in the physical machine itself. Reducing dependence on specialist skills, improving machine utilisation, and dynamically adjusting production plans could deliver meaningful gains.


REDEFINING INNOVATION


The laser industry is rich in technical expertise and engineering talent, but it is also cautious - understandably so. Capital investment is significant, margins are under pressure, and reliability matters. However, if we want to move beyond incremental progress, the focus must shift from machines to systems. From isolated automation to connected workflows. From individual optimisation to integration.


That will require collaboration across OEMs, software providers, and users, along with a willingness to experiment, learn, and occasionally fail. The next meaningful step for the laser industry will come from connecting machines across brands, connecting data across processes, and enabling smarter, more responsive production driven by real customer needs. Until then, we’ll keep calling evolution “innovation” and wondering why it all still feels the same.


info@daltonsmachines.com www.daltonsmachines.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32