Legal challenges Even in circumstances where planning permission is granted, the risk of third-party legal challenges still remain to the granting of planning permission through judicial review. Whilst this risk is likely to be less in circumstances where the principle of development has been estab- lished through an allocation in the Local Plan, there are various ways in which the validity of any permission may be challenged. It should be stressed that a DCO may also be the subject of a legal challenge. T e focus of any challenge is not on the merits of a project, but
the decision-making process and legality of that. For that reason, it is critical that for contentious applications – or those subject to local interest or scrutiny – care is taken at each stage of the decision- making process to ensure that the grant of permission (whether from the LPA or through the DCO process) is robust. Howes Percival’s specialist planning law team has continued to
Recent years have seen an increase in the promotion, for
example, of rail freight interchanges, with several being granted DCOs and several more in the pipeline. T e fundamental aspect of these proposals that bring them within the scope of the DCO regime is the modal shift from road to rail freight. T e associated warehousing is linked to that transport infrastructure that qualifi es as a NSIP. In a planning system which prioritises sustainable development, reducing the carbon impacts by taking vehicles off road is a key driver in trying to utilise rail freight transportation. Confi rmation of DCOs is the subject of independent examina-
tion by professional examiners appointed by the Secretary of State. Although local people and relevant local authorities aff ected will have the right to participate in that process, the decision making is taken out of the hands of the LPA and therefore should be less politicised than with the planning application process. Whilst the DCO process is substantial and costly, in some cases the DCO route may be preferable to the conventional planning application process.
Development plan policies In circumstances where a DCO cannot be used, then planning permission will, of course, be required for warehousing and distribution parks and logistics hubs. Where large-scale schemes are proposed, as is often the case
with these forms of development, they are normally expected to be promoted through the LPA’s Local Plan. T at would involve seeking to identify the site as suitable and appropriate in the location for the intended purpose and persuading the LPA, through the various stages of the preparation of a local plan, to allocate the site for the intended purpose in the fi nal adopted version. If the proposed site is allocated within an adopted local plan, then the presumption, of course, is that development will be permitted in accordance with that plan. Whilst it would be normal to promote large scale schemes
through the Local Plan, applications do come forward on a specu- lative basis. Without planning policy support in an adopted plan, the starting point would normally be that these developments would not be acceptable, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. Other material factors including ecology, transport and highways, biodiversity impacts etc which would need to be satisfactorily addressed through evidence. However, we have seen examples of such speculative development being approved by LPAs and on appeal where, for example, there is a clear demonstrable need for the development that may outweigh the absence of any planning policy support.
15
work with promoters and developers across the region and beyond to help secure consents for their development projects, and work with the consultant teams to ensure that the planning process is legally sound. T is includes routinely reviewing draft planning applications and the LPA’s decision-making process, including scrutiny of planning conditions to ensure these are not only robust, but ensure proper delivery of a scheme. T rough those actions, even if a permission is legally challenged, we have the confi dence that ultimately permissions would be upheld. More widely, alongside our planning expertise, Howes Percival
has specialist: ■ property lawyers who assist landowners and promoters with the promotion of land for warehousing and distribution purposes; developers in connection with the delivery of those schemes; and also operators seeking to lease or purchase such buildings
■ employment and regulatory lawyers who can advise on particular personnel issues facing the logistics sector, including drafting of employment contracts, dealing with working hours queries, disciplinary procedures, grievances, licence compliance, and other matters
■ commercial lawyers who can advise on the terms of distribu- tion agreements, terms and conditions for supply and purchase, long-term outsourcing agreements etc.
If we can help you with any of the issues raised in this article, email
paul.hunt@
howespercival.com or jay.
mehta@howespercival.com, or visit
www.howespercival.com
LOGISTICS & WAREHOUSING
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68
