search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Company insight


Nato members’ militaries have access to vast quantities of data that is constantly changing and often widely distributed, making it hard to access the desired information on demand. In the defence sector, where information can rapidly devalue as it ages, accessibility and timeliness are key issues. At the same time, the required information can frequently be located on high-threat networks from untrusted sources, and traditional software-based technologies cannot pass information assurance requirements as they are not secure enough, made vulnerable by the same flexibility that helped drive the modern information revolution.


Garrison has taken a new approach to multi-domain operations, developing a unique, ultra-secure, hardware-based, commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS), cross- domain access solution that addresses these issues. This system aims to provide previously unachievable levels of connectivity between a wider range of systems and networks – allowing key information to be accessed more easily, letting decisions be made faster and more securely, thereby enabling the safe operation of a complex, multi- domain infrastructure.


“What Nato has is a need to embrace open-source intelligence,” explains Flanagan. “A need to reach out to all these different information spaces but, prior to technology like Garrison’s, what that would have resulted in was a degraded cybersecurity posture.” As Nato laid out within a recent RFI around cyber operations, the alliance is looking to harden their cybersecurity posture, which is somewhat at odds with its drive towards OSINT – by its very nature, it involves reaching into more dangerous places and the increased risk that goes with it.


This paradox is where Garrison comes in. Its hardware-based cross-domain access technology hardens users’ cybersecurity posture, thereby enabling that desired reach into the broader open- source environment. “Put on the rubber gloves and reach into the mess that is the internet safely, without getting anything icky on your hands,” sums up Flanagan. In addition, much of the data transmitted for operational forces can be in a format that cannot be sufficiently


Rather than being a cross-domain transfer solution, Garrison aims to be a cross-domain access solution, increasing security by accessing data without moving it across the information boundary.


filtered, making it difficult to transfer from its native platform to sensitive environments. For example, when a Word document is imported into a secured network, any macros within it are too complex to make safe and are therefore excluded.


At the simplest level, Flanagan says, Garrison aims to bolster its clients’ interoperability by easing their ability to natively engage in a range of remote environments – for example, handling complex data, sending and receiving email in-domain, and minimising the need for exchanges cross-domain. This approach can significantly mitigate the information exchange requirement between domains, easing the challenge of connectivity – doing it securely, effectively and efficiently.


Ease of access


For Nato personnel and those operating elsewhere in the defence sector, accessing public networks like the internet would require an entirely separate infrastructure – or, alternatively, would lead to people turning away from their classified workspace to access the internet on their personal devices and try to remember what they saw back at their workplace. Similarly, the chief concern for Nato members and other armed forces around the world is that their OSINT systems are both safe and secure. At the same time, allies or other departments within a nation may make use of older or near-obsolete systems, with users seeing little need to move on from what has worked for them in the past – creating the need to overcome


Defence & Security Systems International / www.defence-and-security.com


this overreliance. Garrison’s cross-domain access solution resolves these problems, enabling personnel to access the internet and other high-risk networks directly from the comfort of their usual desktop, without compromising the safety or security of the classified network. It provides an ultra- secure mechanism that allows Nato- classified environments to connect directly to these partner environments, but without needing to move the data in question. “It’s a cross-domain access solution, rather than a cross-domain transfer solution,” Flanagan explains. “When I’m working into that remote environment, I’m using its native tools, native data, native applications. I don’t need to worry about information transformation at the boundary, because I never move it across the boundary – I just reach in and see it.”


This also effectively prioritises operators’ needs so that they don’t require new training and responsibilities that are not native and natural to their prior experience – creating that key blend of people, processes and tools outlined by Nato in their stated OSINT goals. For Garrison, it’s a priority that – even as its cross-domain access solution integrates and streamlines information sharing within a robust security model – as far as the user is concerned, they’re continuing to use the same browser, desktop, tools and processes with which they’re familiar. “We want to change the world, basically,” says Flanagan. “[To get people to] stop trusting complex software and actually get into proven hardware-based separation and isolation. That’s the goal.” ●


www.garrison.com 51


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57