search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Comment | 3


COMMENT


The issue of carbon has been extremely prominent in the media these last few weeks. World leaders have descended


on Glasgow for COP26 and a huge number of events focused on reducing carbon emissions have been taking place both at the conference and also around the world. All of this translates into an


opportunity for timber’s embodied carbon benefits to be more widely recognised. Things are definitely progressing in that direction. In our opinion columns this month, Wood for Good’s


Sarah Virgo says the wood industries must continue to make the most of the recent buzz around wood. She says considerations around embodied carbon


combined with market pressure on the timber supply chain serve to remind us of the critical role that timber can play in the circular economy and potential of timber buildings in a net-zero future. Additionally, in our news we report that newly-created


Timber Development UK (TDUK) is bringing clarity to how to account for embodied carbon in timber construction with a newly released technical paper. It is aimed at building designers, clients, and


contractors when assessing the embodied carbon associated with buildings and other structures, as well as product manufacturers and suppliers in demonstrating the carbon impact of their products. There is more. At COP26 the Tropical Timber Accord,


developed in concert by the Timber Trade Federation, highlights that strong, inclusive legal frameworks are essential for the sustainable management of tropical


TTJ – the voice of the timber Industry


forests and that this underpins all other climate policy ambitions. “Global Forests need Global Governance” proposes


a new governance approach for the global tropical forest sector based on national standards within an international framework. Crucially, it also proposes supporting an international secretariat to administer and oversee the development of this framework. Also timed with COP26 in mind is James Latham’s new


Carbon Calculator. After over 12 months of work, the Calculator is designed to give a combined score or rating for its products based on carbon footprint and “locked in” stored carbon (biogenic), thereby increasing visibility of carbon impacts and directing customers towards more sustainable products. It has taken more than 12 months of work to produce


and is seen by the company as a very important tool designed to give full transparency on the carbon impact side of its products and aid the wider appreciation and specification of wood’s benefits. As Lathams’ group head of marketing Stuart Devoil says, it’s not just CSR anymore but the carbon issue is becoming a commercial issue. There will undoubtedly be increasing global focus on


the carbon agenda in the months and years to come. Wood’s embodied carbon story is a narrative that needs to be front and centre of the debate.


GROUP EDITOR www.ttjonline.com


► MARKET UPDATE – SOFTWOOD Latest news on the softwood sector and how it is faring in this period of high demand and high prices


► OPINION – 2022 PREDICTIONS TTJ asks key players in the industry how they think 2022 will pan out and where they think the challenges and opportunities will lie


► SECTOR FOCUS – COATINGS & FINISHES


Our annual update from the world of coatings and finishes, speaking to major manufacturers and users of the products


► PLUS REGULARS


Latest UK and world news; technical news; comment from industry figures; and latest appointments.


www.ttjonline.com | November/December 2021 | TTJ


► FEATURE – FORESTRY CONFERENCE Coverage of the annual Forestry Conference, which is organised by the CLA, the Forestry Commission and Grown in Britain


► FEATURE – CYBERSECURITY A look at why operational technology (OT) security is so vulnerable to cybersecurity threats


Next issue


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93