search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sector Focus: Preservatives & Fire Retardants | 29


DEADLINE ON THE HORIZON


From July 2022 every wood treatment operation managed by or supplying members of the Timber Trade Federation must be quality assured by an independent third-party. As the deadline approaches, UK-based wood treaters are likely to turn to the WPA’s ‘Benchmark’ quality scheme, writes the WPA’s chief executive, Gordon Ewbank


The Wood Protection Association’s (WPA) Benchmark quality scheme provides independent confirmation that wood products have been treated correctly in accordance with BS 8417, the British Standard for preservative impregnated wood, and the WPA Code of Practice for Industrial Wood Preservation 2021. Whilst BS 8417 specifies the minimum levels of preservative penetration and retention for every application where wood is used, it does not provide recommendations on how to achieve these critical levels of protection. In this respect it points to the WPA Code of Practice for the essential process guidance. The WPA Benchmark quality scheme operates on the principle that wood treated in accordance with the WPA Code will achieve the minimum penetration and retention requirements for the end use and service life set in BS8417. Put simply, WPA Benchmark provides the third-party verification of compliance with BS 8417 that TTF members are seeking.


Benchmark broke new ground when it was launched 10 years ago but it is now tried and tested and we believe that the decision taken in 2020 by TTF members to require third- party verification of treated wood will be a major driver to change the way such products are marketed in the UK, building supply chain and buyer confidence and growing demand. Feedback from wood treaters who were early adopters of the WPA Benchmark show clearly that the scheme has improved customer satisfaction regarding the performance of treated wood in service. These are exactly the commercial benefits that lay behind the decision of TTF members to make the third-party quality assurance of treated wood a key part of their drive to grow demand for treated wood that can be trusted. WPA Benchmark verifies the quality of an individual treated wood product such as a fence post, decking joist or building component. The scheme provides independent confirmation for both sellers and buyers that a wood product is compliant with the


standards set in BS 8417. For ground contact applications a key feature of the scheme is that treated wood products with both the 15 and 30 years desired service life treatment specifications can be certificated. Wood treaters looking to join WPA Benchmark must be able to demonstrate that a consistent relationship known as the ‘Safe Relationship’ exists between penetration and retention requirements and the more easily measurable aspects of the treatment process, such as preservative concentration and pressure cycle. They must then be able to show that they can control these various aspects in subsequent treatment activities. Verification that a treatment safe relationship is in place for every product requiring WPA Benchmark certification is assessed by an independent auditor. Depending on the data provided by the treater this is carried out either remotely or at the treatment site. Once a treater achieves accreditation the continued certification of their products is subject to an annual surveillance audit. Depending on the compliance history of a treater this too can be a remote audit. Under the scheme, Approved Products are those lines for which the production process has been subject to audit and for which the required penetration and retention of preservative has been assured by direct testing or by safe relationship testing. Approved


Products will normally be defined by end use/Use Class, species and service life as a minimum. The scope of Products approved will be recorded on a company’s Benchmark accreditation certificate and should be clearly stated in/on company marketing materials, online or in paper form.


Approved Treaters are those companies operating a treatment plant or plants that have been subject to audit and shown capable of producing Approved Products under the terms of the Benchmark scheme. Not all materials produced by an Approved Treater will necessarily be Approved Products, depending on the scope of products submitted for audit.


More details of the scheme and costs can be found in WPA/TTF Guidance Note TW07 WPA Benchmark QAS Executive Summary, available to download free of charge from the WPA website (www.thewpa.org.uk). We have expanded our team of independent auditors to help meet demand for treaters seeking accreditation to WPA Benchmark before the deadline of July next year. The process of accreditation does not happen quickly and can take a number of weeks if the required data is not available or is incomplete, so we would encourage TTF members who have not already started the process to get in touch now and avoid an accreditation log-jam in the new year. ■


Above: WPA Benchmark verifies the quality of an individual treated wood product such as a decking joist PHOTO: HOPPINGS SOFTWOOD PRODUCTS


www.ttjonline.com | November/December 2021 | TTJ


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93