Above left: Sweden accounts for about 40% of UK softwood imports PHOTO: MICHAEL ENGMAN Above right: Swedish Wood sees scope for further deepening the relationship between Swedish and UK timber sectors PHOTO: MICHAEL ENGMAN
Rudenstam, who is on the UK Structural Timber Association (STA) board. Swedish Wood has a close working relationship with both organisations.
It might at first seem counter intuitive, but it also works with UK forestry and timber sector body, Confor.
“Some people say hold on, aren’t you supporting a competitor to Swedish timber,” said Mr King. “But we don’t see it like that. We’re all working to raise the profile of timber and to increase its availability and use. Our work is mutually beneficial.” The wider Swedish forest industries have long been represented by one body, the SFIF, while in the past the UK sector’s representation has been more fragmented. But the formation of the Confederation of Timber Industries as the UK’s association of associations has changed that, says Mr King, helping reinforce co-operation and communication with Swedish Wood. “The UK now has a body which harnesses the skills and resources of the whole sector and strengthens its voice to policy and decision makers,” he said. When asked which aspects of Swedish timber Swedish Wood stresses particularly in its marketing; its quality, technical or environmental performance, or the service which underpins it, Mr King responded “all of the above”.
“It’s about the whole picture,” he said. “Communicating just how key timber is as a resource to Sweden and how committed it is to developing its potential and to its sustainability.”
The SFIF is industry funded and Swedish
Wood’s programme is decided each autumn, with some projects rolling on, and new ones introduced.
Naturally enough, promoting and supporting use of wood in construction generally and wood-based building especially is a prime objective for Swedish Wood, again working closely with UK bodies. “There’s no doubt there is a shift in momentum in UK timber building,” said Mr King. “We’ve got the government-industry Timber in Construction Working Group and
its Timber in Construction Roadmap, and we’re seeing leading housing developers setting up or acquiring timber frame manufacturing factories with an eye to further market growth. “Taylor Wimpey’s big new plant in
Peterborough, which I visited is a case in point. So far, it’s only partially occupied, and they said it’s to future proof it, giving them scope for growth. The wider consensus is that, given the combination of UK housing need and net zero targets, timber building’s time has come. There are, of course, still the timber building sceptics in construction and, working with the Structural Timber Association, in particular timber in construction manager Stewart Dalgarno, we part sponsor their learning journey visits within the UK to forest sites, timber building developments and construction operations to see latest advances in the sector. They’ve got up to four of these planned for 2025-2026.” It’s also Swedish Wood’s ambition to get politicians on a Swedish timber construction fact finding visit, notably the UK housing minister if possible and to engage and develop relations with housing development agency Homes England and critically the UK building insurance sector in the evolution of its approach to timber building. “We will be scoping out the potential for an event in spring 2026,” said Mr King. Swedish Wood also backs the now annual TDUK Timber Design conference for the wider timber construction sector, from architects to housing associations (see pp47-50) and is the founder and funder of the online timber learning platform Wood Campus. This is now being integrated with the TDUK website and its education material to reach out to a wider audience.
Fire safety in timber construction is also naturally a core topic for Swedish Wood and it is co-founder and co-host of the
timberfiresafety.org website with TDUK and the STA. There are plans for developing this too. “Clearly, since the horror of the Grenfell disaster the focus on fire safety has been even more paramount and the use of combustible
materials in construction, which of course includes wood despite it not being implicated in Grenfell, was central to the subsequent Hackett inquiry and changes in Building Regulations,” said Mr King. “The Timber Fire Safety website is extremely detailed and thorough, informed by Sweden’s in-depth experience of timber building, and highly demanding national and EU regulation. But at the same time, it’s very technical. Our aim is to further adapt it to the UK environment and complement it with a more stepwise approach to this essential information, to make it more user friendly and broaden its appeal and accessibility.”
It is also Swedish Wood’s role to keep the UK ahead of the changing dynamics of the Swedish supply base. In the immediate future this will include an increasing importance in the supply mix of pine. “A combination of factors, including storm damage, a post-Covid spike in demand and patterns of harvesting and felling, and to a lesser extent, spruce bark beetle in southern Sweden, will see a temporary dent in supply of spruce and a complementary upturn in pine, the two of which are interchangeable in most areas of application,” said Mr King. “It’s not an issue of total availability and definitely not ‘there’s no more spruce’ but it’s a situation we will keep the market informed about.”
Looking to the long-term, Mr King is clearly excited by his new role. “The UK and Sweden have such a long history of working together in the timber market and I really believe there are more opportunities to come. In particular, I see possibilities for raising the profile of the Swedish Wood brand in the UK market. It’s a bit about using the logo a bit more, but more than that. It’s about highlighting our role and what we can offer UK timber traders, specifiers and end users,” he said. “On taking up my new position it was also agreed I should present to the Swedish Wood market committee on what we’re doing in the UK market and with the UK timber industry. I want to get that communication right up there.” ■
www.ttjonline.com | September/October 2025 | TTJ
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101
