search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEW BUILD | POWERING PORTS


The Flandre Maritime electrical substation in Saint-Georges-sur- l’Aa will be a major power supply point for the port of Dunkirk and will support the increased use of nuclear power Source: RTE


An indication of the likely impact came from


Megan Turner, environment and sustainability manager at the UK’s Port of Dover – just across the Channel from Dunkirk – in a session at LogisticsUK’s ‘Delivering Decarbonisation’ meeting. Turner explained that Dover port currently has a peak use of 7 MW across its estate. But it is anticipating it will need a 160 MW connection, if it is to serve electric vessels using its cruise, cargo and ferry terminals and other electric vehicles using the site. That includes thousands of HGVs passing through, as well as site-based vehicles used by its contractors and logistics operators, who are already beginning to move to electric vehicles. Dover currently hosts two hybrid ferries, but the batteries


are charged by diesel engines because there is currently no opportunity to charge either at Dover or Calais. Turner said that to meet its future demand the port of Dover had considered solutions as diverse as a small modular nuclear reactor, or a link to France. In practice, she thought it would use a variety of local supplies – solar, wind etc – linked via private wire. That distributed supply would also be more resilient, she said. But upgrading the connections that would allow it to hike its input from 7 MW to 160 MW would require network upgrades across the southeast as far as London.


Linking up In France, the Port of Dunkirk has taken steps to address the lack of network capacity, as well as ensuring a power supply from Gravelines. It said that in 2024, the Gravelines nuclear power


plant was France’s leading producer of low-carbon electricity, with output covering the equivalent of 70% of consumption in the Hauts-de- France region. This will be reinforced in the coming years thanks to the extension of the lifespan of the six existing reactors, the


78 | April 2026 | www.neimagazine.com


optimisation of the facilities and the installation of the two new EPR2 reactors. The French government officially launched the Grand


Chantier EPR2 Gravelines project on 18 June 2025. It followed the National Commission for Public Debate’s acknowledgement on 20 May 2025 of the decision by project owners EDF and RTE to proceed, following public debate, with the project to build a pair of EPR2 reactors at Gravelines. A Major Project Charter between institutional and regional partners now sets out the framework for coordinating this large operation. Dunkirk port expects that at Gravelines “2026 will mark the start of preparatory work”, including implementation of environmental measures and preliminary site development. Meanwhile, the Port of Dunkirk players involved in the


transport and distribution of electricity are investing heavily to restructure the network and serve customers. On 28 April 2025, RTE laid the foundation stone for


the Flandre Maritime electrical substation in Saint- Georges-sur-l’Aa, which is set to become one of the most powerful in France. It will be a major power supply point for the region, with two 400 kV overhead lines serving the eastern part of the port and the Dunkirk conurbation in particular. Partial commissioning is scheduled for July 2026 and full commissioning at the end of 2030. A new substation in the Dunkerque Logistique


Internationale (DLI) zone will be subject to public consultation in 2026. Work could begin in 2028, with commissioning scheduled for 2030. With the necessary infrastructure development


underway and more nuclear power capacity anticipated, the future of Dunkirk port could be driven by nuclear. Should that come to pass the rise of nuclear-powered shipping might be achieved in a rather unexpected way. ■


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112