search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMENTARY | A STORY OF INNOVATION


A story of progress and innovation


Over the last 70 years nuclear energy has been a story of innovation, resilience and, at times, missed opportunity. Today nuclear is an industry at the centre of the strategic debate about how we meet rising demand while delivering net zero.


By Tom Greatrex, CEO, Nuclear Industry Association


SEVENTY YEARS ON, Nuclear Engineering International marks more than an anniversary. It reflects the continued importance of an industry at the centre of today’s energy challenges. Since the 1950s, nuclear has been a story of innovation, resilience and, at times, missed opportunity. In those early years, nuclear power represented both


technological progress and national ambition. The UK was at the forefront. Calder Hall, opened in 1956, was the world’s first commercial nuclear power station, demonstrating what was possible when government, industry and science aligned behind a common goal. Those early designs were innovative and developed in a rapidly evolving regulatory and technical environment. They established the foundations of a global industry. Over time, that industry has matured significantly. Reactor designs have become more standardised, operational performance has improved, and safety frameworks have strengthened beyond recognition. Progress has not always been straightforward, and events in the industry’s history have had profound impacts on public confidence and regulatory approaches. They also drove lasting improvements in safety culture, transparency and international collaboration. Public attitudes have also evolved. Periods of scepticism


have given way to a more balanced and increasingly positive reassessment. That shift is now accelerating, shaped by global events that have brought energy security and resilience back into sharp focus. As the realities have become clearer, nuclear’s value is impossible to ignore. It provides firm, low-carbon power, strengthens system resilience and reduces exposure to volatile fossil fuel markets. The UK continues to play a leading role. From early


reactor programmes to today’s expertise in operations, decommissioning and fuel services, our industry remains a global contributor. Yet one lesson from our own history is


particularly striking. The barriers to progress have rarely been technical. More often, they have been political. Sizewell B was once intended to be part of a fleet of new stations, not a single project delivered in isolation. That ambition was not sustained, and the result has been decades of stop-start development. Today, projects such as Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C show what can be achieved with sustained commitment, while the UK is also positioning itself at the forefront of small modular reactors and advanced technologies. The message is clear: Long-term planning and consistent policy are as important as engineering excellence if we are to deliver at scale. This is not just about energy. It is about jobs, industrial capability and long-term economic value across the country. That context is critical today. Nuclear energy is once again


central to the strategic debate about how we meet rising demand while delivering net zero. The case is clear: Without new nuclear, the transition will be more difficult, more costly and less secure. Alongside renewables, nuclear provides the firm capacity needed to keep the system stable and to support wider decarbonisation. This is not just a UK conversation. Internationally, sentiment is shifting decisively. Our research shows that 87% of the world’s economy now supports new nuclear power, compared to just 5.5% pursuing phase-out policies. The next phase of nuclear development will look different.


Small modular reactors, including deployment at Wylfa, and advanced designs offer the potential for faster deployment, greater flexibility and broader application. But technology alone will not determine success. Delivery will depend on sustained investment, long-term policy certainty and a clear commitment from government to maintain momentum. Just as importantly, it will require continued investment in skills to ensure we have the workforce needed to build and operate the next generation of projects. As we reflect on the past seventy years, one lesson stands out. The nuclear industry succeeds when there is alignment between ambition, policy and delivery. That remains true today. The challenges we face, including decarbonisation, energy security and economic resilience, are urgent, but they are also an opportunity for nuclear to demonstrate its full value. Nuclear Engineering International has documented this


Queen Elizabeth II opens Calder Hall power station. Source: ANS


70 | April 2026 | www.neimagazine.com


story from the beginning, capturing both the progress and the debate that have shaped our sector. The task now is to build on that legacy. With the right decisions, and the same clarity of purpose that defined those early years, nuclear can play an even greater role in the decades ahead, supporting clean growth, strengthening energy security and delivering for communities across the UK and beyond. ■


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112