INSURANCE FRAUD
SHEFFIELD CABBIE HAS TAXI LICENCE REVOKED AFTER £100,000 ACCIDENT FRAUD
A taxi driver has had his licence revoked by Sheffield Taxi Licensing Authority (“TLA”) after he admitted that the claim he and seven other claimants brought for £100,000 was dishonest. Following a full investigation, carried out by Esure Insurance and HF (Horwich Farrelly), it was established that the accident did not take place and then went that step further by ensuring that the public was protected from future criminality from this group. It was alleged on 27 January 2020 that three vehicles – a BMW (insured by Esure) a VW Golf and a Taxi – collided in Sheffield. As a result of the collision, seven claims were presented by the occupants of the three vehicles with Esure's (now ex) customer accepting fault. Esure had concerns that the collision was “staged”. As part of their investigation, they contacted Sheffield TLA to verify whether the taxi driver had reported the collision to them and contacted HF to highlight this as a case of concern, who advised Esure on the prospects of bringing a tort of deceit and tort of conspiracy claim against the drivers of the BMW, Taxi and VW Golf underpinned by engineering evidence. It was quickly established that the BMW had sustained significant fire damage to its engine which rendered it undriveable, so the accident could never have happened. Shortly before HF could launch the claim, the driver of the VW Golf issued proceedings. Seizing this opportunity, a counterclaim was brought against all the drivers for
40
perfect example of the fruition of that hard work by everyone involved. This is the first case of its kind, where we have collaborated to bring a fraudulent taxi driver to justice both in civil proceedings and
exemplary damages and during proceedings several issues were identified which strengthened Esure’s claim. For example, the taxi driver alleged that he was unable to speak, read or write in English thus needing all documents to be translated. However, HF obtained a transcript of an interview between him and Sheffield TLA, under caution, in which he spoke perfect English. Additionally, he signed several documents such as tax returns and a hire agreement in English. Accepting that his case was doomed to fail, the taxi driver provided a witness statement in which he accepted that his claim was dishonest, the information he provided to Sheffield TLA was false and that the collision did not occur. The taxi driver has now paid Esure £12,500 in damages and costs. In addition, Judgment has been entered against Esure’s ex- customer (with a figure to be determined) and the driver of the VF Golf. Including legal costs, the savings are £175,000. Graeme, Mulvoy, Partner at HF said “Over the last 3 years, HF have developed strong relationships with over 45 taxi licensing authorities and this case is the
then with the licensing authorities. Aside from this outcome, it also demonstrates the savings insurers can achieve by working with licensing authorities on claims by taxi drivers”. Andrew Nixon, Head of Fraud at Esure said “We have sent a clear message to all drivers who may consider bringing dishonest claims. We are aware that the referral fees being offered to taxi drivers are very attractive, but this case should act as a stark reminder that we will not only recover our legal costs but take their livelihood to protect our honest customers”. Representative from Sheffield TLA said “Our primary aim is to protect the public and ensure we have honest taxi drivers on our roads. With the hard work and diligences of our officers we have uncovered a large fraudulent offence and for the first time collaborated with the insurance industry to bring the culprits to justice. "We are extremely pleased with the outcome and our officers will continue to take the same approach with any other licensees who commit similar offences. We believe HF have a unique offering to other taxi licensing authorities to safeguard the public”.
SEPTEMBER 2022 PHTM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86
