MOBILITY MATTERS
NOTTINGHAM PHV DRIVER FINED FOR LEAVING COUPLE WITH TWO GUIDE DOGS STRANDED
A disabled husband has described feeling like a ‘second class citizen’ after a driver who was booked to pick him and his wife up drove off after seeing their assistance dogs. Gavin Griffiths, 49, spoke of the ordeal he and wife Mel Griffiths, 57, went through following the incident. The couple, who are both blind and live in Arnold, had booked a PHV in July 2021. The driver arrived and the Griffiths were waiting on the pavement with their guide dogs. But the vehicle turned around and drove off, leaving the couple stranded. Despite pleading not guilty, Rajan Anwar, 52, was convicted by a district judge of failing or refusing to carry out a private hire booking for a disabled person accompanied by an assistance dog. This was after hearing evidence from Mr Griffiths and considering evidence obtained from his phone and Uber, which supported the prosecution’s case. The judge ruled the reason Anwar, from Nottingham, failed to fulfil the booking was due to
the
presence of the guide dogs, not a flat tyre, as Mr Anwar claimed. Anwar was fined £288, ordered to pay a £34 victim surcharge and ordered to pay £100 in compensation to
each of the
Griffithses, as well as a contribution of £500 towards the prosecution costs. Following the court ruling, Mr Griffith said: “It is one of those sort of bitter sweet kind of things - yes it’s good we get justice for being refused access to a taxi, the same as everyone else. It is unfortunate
PHTM FEBRUARY 2023
that the driver decided to come up with a story to contradict what we were saying.” Mr Griffith said such an incident had left him feeling like a “second class citizen”. He explained that at the time of the incident, he and his wife were angry. But he said: “The first thing that was on both our minds was ‘here we go again’, as it wasn’t the first time and it wasn’t the last.” He claimed the couple had experienced similar issues with other drivers and organisations in the past. Mr Griffith said around three months after the incident in July 2021 he had a similar experience with another taxi. In the last five and a half years, Mr Griffith said he has probably experienced similar situations “at least 25 times” with his guide dog, yet never had an issue when he used his cane. He said “it is discrimination”. “The law says you have to take a disabled person with an access dog and if you are not prepared to do that then stop taxi driving as that’s the law. “We were lucky that we also had great support from Gedling’s taxi licensing department. It’s only a
shame that not all licensing authorities take it the same way, there’s plenty out there that do not take it seriously.” Speaking of the incident, Gedling Borough Council portfolio holder for public protection, Councillor David Ellis said: “We are pleased with the court’s decision to hold Mr Anwar accountable for his actions, this case serves as a reminder that discrimination against disabled individuals and their assistance animals is illegal and will not be tolerated.” Nottingham City Council’s Portfolio Holder for Neigh- bourhoods, Safety and Inclusion, Cllr Neghat Khan, added: “The City Council stands in unity with Gedling to promote the equality of access to services for those that are disabled. “As the driver is licensed by the City Council and has been convicted of this offence, the Taxi Licensing service will be reviewing the licence to carefully consider what proportionate action is deemed appropriate. It does not matter where you are driving your taxi, action will be taken as we do cross- border collaboration and we will not tolerate any sort of discrimination.” An Uber spokesperson added: “It is totally unacceptable for drivers to refuse to take a guide dog. We deeply apologise for the experiences described. Licensed private hire drivers must carry service animals in their vehicle - we highlight this obligation to all drivers before they start using the Uber app and often send reminders.”
29
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80
