search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS


begins, nor ends, nor passes through the area for which that authority is responsible (Dittah, at page 363D-F); although it may be that, if an operation engages in journeys none or few of which pass through the geo- graphical area of the licensing authority, then a licence may not be forthcoming from that authority (see the comments of Foskett J in respect of the analogous hack- ney carriage regime in R (Blue Line Taxis) v The Council of the County of Northumberland [2012] EWHC 1539 (Admin) (“Northumberland County Council”) at [61] and following).


[TDO court case database] We also like the way he said:


“If an operation engages in journeys none or few of which pass through the geographically fixed area of the licensing authority, then a licence may not be forthcoming from that authority”


Something Wolverhampton City Council may wish to consider as it was mentioned no less than five times in the second reading of the Taxis and Private Hire Vehicles (Safeguarding and Road Safety) Bill mentioned earlier.


Here is one excerpt: -


I congratulate my hon. Friend on bringing this important Bill to the house. Of the 15,000 private hire licences issued by City of Wolverhampton Council in 2019, many were for drivers spread across the United Kingdom, including at least one as far away as Perth, which is quite some taxi drive. Does my hon. Friend think that the Scottish Govern- ment and other devolved national Governments should, following what will hopefully be the Bill’s passage, work with the UK Government to reciprocate the flow of data to ensure that all authorities throughout the United kingdom have access to the best possible information.


[Parliament Bills online]


That’s quite an achievement, issuing 15,000 private hire licences!


We wondered if Wolverhampton City Council will be sending its licence enforcement officers to Perth? Maybe they should study the 76 Act a little more closely.


Without council enforcement of the 76 Act, which seems quite apparent right across the country at present, it does indeed appear that we have returned to pre-June 1974 and a wild west situation - but this time the councils already have the power to act, but choose not to.


In every case where we have had dealings with councils regarding crossborder hiring and the enforcement of the 76 Act, we have found that elected councillors have understood and had the enthusiasm to enforce. Medway Council being one in particular, actually voted at full council to enforce against Uber for operating illegally in Medway, and yet to date, no action has been taken. So much for democracy.


However, when the issue gets to the council officers, the barriers come up and, quite rightly they seek legal opinion. Amazingly so far, councils’ legal opinions have all come back saying that there is nothing they can do. They are powerless to act. Also, they have all refused any access to see their legal opinion.


We can’t help but find irony in the fact that when council officers ask for a legal opinion, it is of sound advice that they will follow to the end, yet when the trade share a legal opinion that they have sought, it is not worthy of discussion. What makes one QC’s opinion better than another’s, surely that’s for the courts to decide, isn’t it?


Whenever the trade has obtained a legal opinion, it has come back that these operators (it’s not just app companies, it seems lots of operators are jumping on this band wagon) are operating illegally.


To be clear, the views expressed in this article are those of the authors and may not necessarily be those of of the publishers.


See Part 3 in the May issue of PHTM


AT PHTM EXPO MILTON KEYNES MAIN SEMINAR - 1pm TUESDAY 31 MAY


APRIL 2022 11


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104