search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PAGE HEADER


GOLDILOCKS GOES TO MARKET: THE “JUST RIGHT” EVOLUTION OF PRIVATE LABEL IN EVERY DEPARTMENT


Four-Year Performance


Department Private Label Growth (4YA)


Goldilocks Goes to Market: The “Just Right” Evolution of


Private Label in Every Department Tom Barnes, CEO, Category Partners, LLC


For the last two years, the marketplace has navigated inflation, new habits and changing ideas of value. Shoppers are changing, too. In today’s grocery store, “just right” is a moving target. Customers go from one department to the next, weighing experience, trust and quality in different ways across the store.


Private label remains a strong option for value-seeking shoppers, and the latest 52-week data through October 2025 shows that it continues to grow in bakery, dairy and deli. These increases appear alongside stable national brand performance in the center of the store, where recognition and long-established habits continue to guide shoppers.


Looking at the Numbers


Category Partners looked into U.S. retail data for the 52 weeks ending October 25, 2025. We compared current results to both last year and four years ago.


Year-Over-Year Performance Department


Private Label Growth (YoY)


Bakery Dairy Deli


+4.3%


+10.1% +5.8%


Center Store +1.0% Na-


tional Brand Growth (YoY)


+1.6% +5.3% +0.1% +1.9%


Bakery Dairy Deli


Center Store


Private Label Volume (YoY)


+2.0% –0.7% +2.6% –1.4%


National Brand Volume


(YoY)


+0.5% +1.5% –1.7% –1.6%


Over four years, private label has grown faster than national brands across all departments. Bakery and deli also show real unit expansion for private label. These patterns represent steady growth from a smaller base, while branded products continue to account for a larger share of total category dollars.


Bakery Dairy Deli


Center Store


Department +40%


+40.3% +34.2% +32.9%


+25.3% +23.9% +14.9% +23.7%


+12.2% –7.0%


+12.2% –3.6%


Volume (4YA)


+3.4% +3.7% –2.2% –4.5%


National Brand- Growth (4YA)


Private Label Volume


(4YA)


National Brand


Private-


Label Dollar Share 46.8% 35.3% 30.6% 14.4%


Fresh departments show lasting strength. Center store remains steady but depends heavily on promotions. The takeaway is not which side is winning. It is how shoppers now define “better” in each department.


How “Just Right” Changes From Aisle to Aisle


Quality has never meant just one thing. Bakery and deli goods often signal the freshness of in-store or regional preparation. In dairy, it leans toward purity and consistency. In center store, it relates to brand familiarity and habit.


The 2025 data reinforce the department-level differences between private label and branded performance. Fresh departments show private label dollar gains that are not tied only to heavy discounting. In dairy, rising private label dollars alongside modest unit softness suggest some movement into higher-priced items. In the center of the store, national brands continue to benefit from strong promotion strategies that keep shopper attention.


WHAT’S IN STORE | 2026 © 2026 International Dairy Deli Bakery Association


Industry Landscape


33

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176