search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SAFET Y POWTECH SECTION GUIDE...


WHATEVER THE SORTS OF ISSUES DISCUSSED INDUSTRY WIDE, SAFETY IS NEVER FAR FROM THE AGENDA. NEWS OF explosions or fires tends to fill breaking news outlets and the issue frequently dominates seminars and conferences. The authoritative database of combustible dust incidents, Dust Safety Science, is widely regarded as a good source when it comes to the important analytics. A recent review which looks at the first half of 2020, highlighted storage silos as the highest percentage, listing 22 fires and six explosions - up on earlier years which found that dust collection systems had the highest percentage, a figure that this time accounted for only 13 per cent. Overall, 26 dust explosions and 94 dust fires were logged globally in that period, incidents that resulted in four deaths and 30 injuries between January and June 2020. The organisation’s founder, Chris Cloney, suggested on the report’s release that some trends in incident reporting may be due to the fallout from the global pandemic, notably, that the number was down “significantly”, on what can be typically seen in the same period over the past five years. But when asked if he expects an increase as industries become more active, he replied: “History has shown that devastating loss incidents often occur during start-up, abnormal working conditions, or with reduced facility crew. We will have to be very vigilant to avoid these incidents in the months ahead.” Wise words. There were also some interesting findings. Dust collection equipment was involved in 13 per cent of


Reports of fires and explosions may have reduced while businesses have been in lockdown but the threat still remains, so the latest trends are worth noting


cases, wood products were involved in 31 per cent and food products played a role in 41 per cent with 43 per cent occurring in agriculture-related facilities. To the wider world, this must appear anomalous. Food, after all, is benign and harmless – not something that can explode. That is, until you look closely at the incidents involving dust, generally regarded as among the most overlooked hazards in food processing. And one only has to recall the one that occurred in 2008 at the Imperial Sugar refinery in Georgia, USA, killing 14 and injuring 42. Powders, when they are put in suspension, can pose a risk of explosion, which is why they are covered by the ATEX directive and the risks analysed in the same way as explosive vapours. Many explosions have been recorded across process industries involving, for example, flour silos. Their frequency, the effects and the lack of awareness was what prompted the EU to set up the ATEX directive in the first place, making it mandatory to define zones where a dust explosive atmosphere can be present and put in place the measures to prevent or mitigate risk. Everyone involved in the processing of powders and bulk solid has a duty to remain fully appraised of the latest vent regulations and compliant with the sort of industry-approved standards designed to minimise the risk explosions. A significant number of powders and bulk solids in industrial use are combustible. These can range from metals and organic materials such as flour to sugar, chemicals, pigments and resins.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125