search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Lube-Tech PUBLISHED BY LUBE: THE EUROPEAN LUBRICANTS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE


The test rig for the nylon polymer vessel fairlead material is large, Figures 10 and 11. The PET mooring rope is periodically tensioned over a nylon polymer section by a hydraulic arm, first without PFPE lubrication. A ‘Block’ of tension events is applied through the hydraulic actuator, varying up to 150kN, a series of major and minor tension, computer controlled, events for 60 minutes. The rope will move over the central fixed sheave steadily, or not. The block of tension events causes extreme ‘stick/slip’ behavior to occur, Figure 11, with very loud, sudden, noise associated with each slip, i.e., a very loud ‘bang’, with the rope pattern impressed into the nylon polymer surface. The PET rope/nylon polymer surface ‘dry’ friction coefficient is 0.36.


A lubricated nylon sheave section allows the PET rope to flow smoothly over the fairlead sample with no ‘stick/slip’ and no associated noise. There is a considerably reduced wear scar, Figure.12, with a friction coefficient of 0.09.


Figure 13. Very Little Stick/Slip, Low Level of Noise. Rope flows Smoothly over Sheave. Considerably Reduced Wear Scar with Lubricated Nylon Polymer Sheave, Friction Coefficient of 0.09


The Future for Polymer Tribology: There is a need for more effective lubricant additives for polymers, the criteria being:


- the additives must withstand initial chemical attack from the catalyst in casting methods, must also withstand high shear and high temperatures in injection moulding or extrusion,


Figure 10. Plan of Mooring Rope ‘Stick-Slip’ Test Rig


- the lubricant additives must have a long operating life, low volatility and a high resistance to oxidation/degradation,


- the lubricant additives must be compatible with human contact, food contact, according to applications.


Conclusion: The tribology of polymer/metal ad polymer/polymer contacts is more complex than metal/metal or metal/ceramic tribology because of the relative softness of polymers compared to metals. Polymer tribology does not follow the established Laws of Friction and a PV function locus should be determined for each new polymer application. Design conditions must stay within each polymers PV Envelope.


Friction coefficients and wear can be reduced for polymers by using internal fillers, external or intrinsic lubrication. Internal fillers must be softer than the polymer matrix. External lubrication can reduce friction coefficients, down to 0.045, dependent on the lubricant. Internal lubricants reduce friction coefficients to < 0.10, with specialised fluids down to 0.04. ‘Stick/Slip’ can be addressed using specialised intrinsic and external lubricants.


Figure 11. PET Mooring Rope Stretched over Nylon Polymer Sample


Acknowledgements: I am very pleased to acknowledge the contributions of my colleagues at Nylacast, Ade Meshach and Preet Bahra, and discussions, collaboration and project work with Professor Martin Priest, Dr Richard Chittenden and Dr Christopher Dyson at the Universities of Bradford and Leeds, and Dr Isabel Ridge at Tension Technology International.


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.135 OCTOBER 2016 37


No.106 page 6


Figure 12. Effect of Extreme ‘Stick/Slip’ between PET Rope and Unlubricated Nylon Polymer Fairlead Section, ‘Loud Bangs’ with Each Slip. The Pattern of the PET Rope is Impressed into Sheave, ‘Dry’ Friction Coefficient of 0.36


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69