search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Lube-Tech PUBLISHED BY LUBE: THE EUROPEAN LUBRICANTS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE


To promote reliability in this self-certification system, the European oil industry relies on the European Engine Lubricant Quality Management System (EELQMS). EELQMS is a voluntary quality framework developed jointly by ACEA, ATIEL (the Technical Association of the European Lubricants Industry) and the Additive Manufacturers Technical Committee (ATC). Under EELQMS, lubricant marketers are expected to adhere to the ATIEL Code of Practice; a detailed guideline that standardises how oils are developed and tested for ACEA claims. Marketers who follow the ATIEL Code of Practice sign a Letter of Conformance and register it with ATIEL’s administrative arm, SAIL (Services to Associations and Industry in the Lubricants sector). By signing and registering this Letter of Conformance, companies publicly declare their participation in EELQMS and commitment to abide by the industry’s quality standards. ACEA now requires that any marketer making ACEA performance claims must submit such a Letter of Conformance via ATIEL/SAIL, effectively tying ACEA claims to adherence to the CoP. This process doesn’t pre-approve the oil but creates accountability. A list of all lubricant companies who have signed the compliance letter is published by SAIL, and those companies agree to make test data available and to undergo audits if required and requested.


In practice, oil marketers do rigorously follow EELQMS: they invest in running the battery of engine tests defined in the ACEA sequences (often in collaboration with additive suppliers who have testing “packs” of data) and they maintain internal quality systems to ensure that every claimed formulation is covered by valid test results. However, nothing strictly stops an oil marketer from skipping tests, overstating results or not holding a technology supplier accountable for appropriate test data, since there is no official licensing. This is where bodies like ATIEL and VLS step in with compliance monitoring. Since 2014, ATIEL has operated a compliance program that performs random or targeted testing


No.158 page 3


of oils off the market to verify their claims and this was reinforced with a new policy in 2017. SAIL, on behalf of ATIEL, conducts independent monitoring of engine oil quality, checking that products sold as ACEA-compliant do indeed meet the requirements. Over the years, ATIEL’s program has found several non-compliant products globally, including cases of incompatible specification claims (e.g. claiming mutually exclusive ACEA categories on one label) and oils failing certain chemical and physical limits. Documented failures have included out-of-range values for Total Base Number (TBN), sulphated ash, phosphorus content, Noack volatility or viscosity parameters, where the tested sample did not meet the claimed specification limits. When such discrepancies are found, ATIEL can pressure the company to correct or withdraw claims and industry groups like VLS may be alerted for further action.


Figure 2: Lubrizol in-house engine test cell used to test the SFU oils. Image owned and protected by Lubrizol.


While ACEA sequences provide a baseline, many vehicle manufacturers also have their own OEM-specific oil specifications that go beyond ACEA in certain aspects. Examples include Volkswagen’s VW 50400 / 50700, Mercedes-Benz’s MB 229.52 plus several others. Obtaining the right to claim an approval according to an OEM specification always involves a formal approval process: the oil formulation


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.187 JUNE 2025 35


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72