search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Lube-Tech PUBLISHED BY LUBE: THE EUROPEAN LUBRICANTS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE


No.158 page 1


Evaluation of engine oils: ‘suitable for use’ versus OEM-approved standards – Analysing quality, validation processes, and reliability


Damien Browne, Product Manager, and David Growney, Senior Scientist, Lubrizol


Introduction Engine oils are the lifeblood of modern engines and ensuring their quality is critical for reliability and longevity. In the lubricant industry, a distinction has emerged between engine oils that are “Suitable for Use” (SFU), typically meaning the product claims to meet certain specifications without formal approvals and those that carry explicit European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) or Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) approvals.


As indicated in Table 1, the terms ‘Recommended For,’ ‘Meets Requirements Of,’ and ‘Suitable For Use’ do not fully guarantee that the engine oil has undergone testing to a specific approval level, potentially posing performance risks. These terms vary, necessitating the oil marketer to assess the performance of their formulations. In contrast, OEM-approved oils have their performance validated by the OEM.


Table 1: Understanding the terminology used within the industry for engine oils.


Figure 1: Is engine oil testing and OEM approval necessary? The image illustrates a comparison between pistons from an engine test conducted at Lubrizol’s test facility. The piston on the left was tested with an SFU engine oil, which failed at 23 hours, while the piston on the right used an OEM-approved engine oil, successfully completing the full test at 96 hours. This image is owned and protected by Lubrizol.


Lubrizol has examined some of the European landscape for SFU lubricants versus OEM-approved lubricants, reviewing the potential performance gap between the two product standards. Whilst work remains ongoing,


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.187 JUNE 2025 33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72