search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
the impact category, either the fatty acid or the alcohol supply account for the biggest share while the influence of the esterification process is lower in most cases.


The comparative analysis shows the calculated results for both products per impact category.


Table 1: Results of the comparative analysis


LIGALUB 19 TMP has lower environmental impacts in the categories climate change, use of fossil resources and photochemical ozone formation. For acidification, ionising radiation as well as ozone depletion and resource use of minerals and metals, the results for DITA were lower. A higher difference advantaging DITA was found for freshwater, marine and terrestrial eutrophication, land use and water use. Those results can be considered typical for renewable feedstocks based on agricultural biomass as many different impacts like the use of fertiliser and the use of diesel for agricultural machinery are included in the assessment of those feedstocks.


In total, the production process of LIGALUB 19 TMP releases less GHG emissions (- 15.8 %) than the fossil- based DITA production process. Taking the biogenic carbon uptake into consideration, a carbon footprint of 3.79 kg CO2


eq/kg is achieved for LIGALUB 19 TMP which leads to overall 45.7 % GHG savings.


A comprehensive sensitivity analysis has been carried out to determine how value and methodological parameters affect the results. Different alternative scenarios were considered and two key findings can be highlighted:


The LIGALUB 19 TMP values for eutrophication of freshwater are very high compared to DITA. The value can mostly be attributed to the wastewater treatment in the palm kernel oil refinery. The results highly depend on the chosen dataset and improvements can be observed if a dataset based on other refinery practices is used. For the baseline scenario, the most conservative option has been chosen.


Figure 2: Climate change results for LIGALUB vs. DITA


Besides the choice of a refinery dataset, selecting a raw material from specific more environmentally friendly agricultural practices can lead to significant improvement of the carbon footprint. Using RSPO certified palm oil enables carbon footprint savings of up to 61 % in comparison to DITA. The savings are mainly related to the emission reduction potential from land use change.


Conclusion and outlook The study compared two products from different value chains. Therefore, the nature and manufacturing pathways of the used raw materials were different and certain impact categories were more relevant in one system than in the other. Nevertheless, both products are intended for the same kind of application and therefore allowed for a comparison of the environmental benefits. All in all, benefits in climate change could be observed for LIGALUB 19 TMP in comparison to DITA resulting in total carbon footprint savings of up to 61 %. These insights highlight the benefits of bio-based products and help customers in the lubricants industry in making informed choices. The need for a transition from fossil-based to renewable materials to achieve defossilisation and net-zero targets is clear.


www.nova-institut.de www.peter-greven.de


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.185 FEBRUARY 2025


25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68