search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Continued from page 23


The system boundaries for this LCA were set as cradle-to-gate, i.e. it covers all relevant life cycle stages from the supply of materials (e.g. palm fruit or fossil resources) to the production of LIGALUB 19 TMP or DITA. Use phase and end-of-life have not been included as the applications for both products are similar and out of the control of base oil manufacturers.


At different steps in the raw material supply chain, multiple co-products are produced at the same time which makes partitioning necessary. In this LCA, the mass allocation approach was preferred, first because a single type of allocation method throughout the life cycle of the product leads to better transparency and second because other types of allocation, such as energy or economic allocation, were found less suitable due to the volatile market situation of these products and the fact that they have multiple purposes, for food, feed, fuels, chemicals and other materials.


The quality of the used data is essential for conducting an LCA. For the assessment of LIGALUB 19 TMP primary data were provided by Peter Greven and where no primary data were available secondary data were taken from the Ecoinvent 3.8 database and expert estimates. For the production of DITA, secondary data were used to replicate the European production of DITA.


The potential environmental impacts have been assessed based on the Environmental Footprint 3.0 method (EF 3.0). The method includes a total of 16 impact categories, which are depicted in figure 1. It has to be noted that three impact categories from the


method related to eco- and human toxicity were not included in external communication, because they are seen as not robust enough to be used for external communications.2


For bio-based products, the biogenic carbon uptake has to be taken into account as well. The characterisation factors of -1 for CO2 +1 for CO2


uptake and


emissions were used. As the biogenic carbon uptake of the main material is considered as being a product property, the uptake was calculated based on the biogenic carbon content of the product. Therefore, LIGALUB 19 TMP was attributed with a biogenic carbon uptake of 2.08 kg CO2


/kg based on


its bio-based carbon content of 81 % and DITA was attributed with 0 kg CO2


/kg based on its bio-based carbon content of 0 %.


Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) The LCIA aims at evaluating and understanding the magnitude and significance of the potential environmental impacts. With the contribution analysis, the comparative analysis and the sensitivity analysis it includes different perspectives.


Within the scope of the contribution analysis of 1kg lubricant ester, the influence of the different raw materials and processes was investigated for each of the impact categories.


For LIGALUB 19 TMP the evaluation shows that the major impacts arise from the upstream palm fruit bunch and fatty acid supply while the influence of alcohol supply and esterification process are low for most of the indicators. For DITA, dependent on


Figure 1: Contribution analysis for 1 kg lubricant ester (left: DITA, right: LIGALUB 19 TMP) 2


Sala, S., Cerutti, A. and Pant, R., Development of a weighting approach for the Environmental Footprint, EUR 28562 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, ISBN 978-92-79-68041-0 (print),978- 92-79-68042-7 (pdf), doi:10.2760/945290 (online),10.2760/446145 (print), JRC106545


24


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.185 FEBRUARY 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68