search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
LOCAL REPORT


United States


While international governments look to ban internal combustion engines (ICEs), in the U.S. the debate is centered on vehicle fuel economy. The Obama administration tasked OEMs with raising the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) to 50 mpg by 2026. The Trump administration reversed this regulation with a proposal that cars and light duty trucks need to average 37 mpg by 2026 arguing that fuel efficient vehicles cost consumers more which goes against their best interests over the short-term.


The Trump administration has also proposed stripping the state of California of its special authority to create its own fuel economy standard which has resulted in California and a number of other states announcing their intention to challenge this move.


Although the U.S. has resisted federal action to ban internal combustion engines, the state of California has implemented an EV mandate that requires automakers to sell electric cars and light duty trucks. The exact number of vehicles offered for sale is based on the automakers’ overall sales within the state. Other states are considering following suit.


At federal level, the government is offering a tax incentive of $7,500 for consumers to purchase electric vehicles. Widespread adoption of electric vehicles would require a major upgrade of the nation’s electric infrastructure and so far there is no serious plan to provide this.


Lubricant manufacturers have also closely followed President Trump’s regulatory reform initiatives including an early directive that for every new regulation issued, two regulations should be withdrawn which has resulted in outdated and irrelevant regulations being rescinded.


A focus of regulatory reform has centered on the Environmental Protection Agency which recently opted against expanding regulation of hazardous


Holly Alfano,


Chief Executive Officer, ILMA (Independent Lubricant Manufacturers Association)


substances under the Clean Water Act. Lubricant manufacturers were concerned about a potential expansion of the Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule to include tanks that contain hazardous substances. The Agency opted against moving forward with an expansion of the rule.


ILMA has engaged in an advocacy initiative to remove obsolete oils, engine oils that don’t meet a current American Petroleum Institute (API) service category, from the marketplace. The Association is working with the National Conference on Weights and Measures (NCWM), a body of state regulators, to develop regulations which ILMA expects to be approved and adopted on a state-by-state basis in 2019.


On metalworking fluids, the association is also closely following the development of 3D printing, or additive manufacturing, and the resulting impact on MWFs. Aircraft manufacturers are already using 3D to manufacture parts and automakers are following. ILMA hopes to move forward in collating data to better assess the possible impact on our sector.


Since 1948, the Independent Lubricant Manufacturers Association (ILMA) has been the voice of the sector with more than a quarter of U.S. automotive lubricants and three-quarters of its metalworking fluids produced and marketed by its members.


Through an enforceable Code of Ethics, ILMA promotes integrity and quality in lubricant manufacturing and marketing and closely monitors legislative and regulatory issues that affect our members.


LINK www.ilma.org


66


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.147 OCTOBER 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72