INVESTMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
Managing the NHS estate: a radical rethink
The NHS may be on the brink of a fundamental rethink of its estate, not just as infrastructure to maintain, but as a strategic asset that can improve outcomes and reduce costs. Tim Chell, health sector and regional director at BAM UK & Ireland, looks at the role NHS buildings have to play in unlocking cost savings that can be reinvested directly into patient care.
For decades, the NHS has struggled with ageing, inefficient buildings, fragmented funding, and bureaucratic delays that have slowed construction within the health sector, leaving hospitals and health centres operating below their potential, and adding pressure to both staff and patients.
Many NHS buildings were designed for a very
different model of care when services were more centralised and the demands on facilities were far less complex. As clinical services have evolved, estates have often struggled to keep pace, leaving NHS staff working in environments that were never designed for modern healthcare delivery. These inefficiencies come at a significant financial cost.
Poor energy performance and outdated infrastructure increase operational expenditure, diverting valuable resources away from frontline care. Beyond energy costs, ageing buildings also affect the way hospitals operate day to day. Layouts that restrict patient flow and limited diagnostic capacity can all reduce the efficiency of care delivery. And when buildings limit how services function, the impact is felt not only in operational costs but in patient experience and staff productivity. This is leading the NHS to a radical rethink of its estate.
The Royal Cornwall Hospital in Truro.
Last year, the government unveiled an ambitious ten-year plan for the NHS to secure its long-term future. Critical to the success of this plan will be the hospital buildings and
healthcare centres where care happens, with three key reforms identified: a shift from hospital to community care, from analogue to digital systems, and from sickness to prevention.
Cost savings through estate management Understandably, for financially stretched NHS Trusts, estate investment has historically been viewed as a cost to be managed – a cost which takes away funding for patient care. Maintenance, building compliance, and refurbishment have often been treated as isolated capital exercises, disconnected from clinical priorities and patient outcomes. However, there is now growing recognition that estate investment, particularly decarbonisation and energy efficiency upgrades, can deliver measurable cost savings. These savings can be reinvested into patient care, creating a virtuous cycle where infrastructure improvements directly support clinical delivery. This shift in thinking reflects a broader understanding
that healthcare estates are not simply operational assets but critical components of the care pathway. The design, layout, and performance of buildings can influence everything from waiting times and diagnostic capacity to staff wellbeing and infection control. When estates are planned strategically, they become active enablers of better clinical outcomes rather than passive infrastructure. In conversations with Trusts, contractors are already seeing the way the ten-year plan is changing the landscape and shifting perspectives of how estates must function. There is a growing recognition that hospital buildings and healthcare centres can be used as strategic enablers of better health outcomes and a better patient experience. The New Hospital Programme will deliver important new capacity, with thirty schemes approved under the programme. However, most Trusts will continue to operate from existing buildings for decades to come. With more than 10,000 buildings and a maintenance backlog estimated at £16bn, if the NHS is to meet these new ambitions, its existing estate must evolve, be upgraded, and become the backbone of patient care. This shift in thinking is perhaps not surprising considering
then prime minister Keir Starmer’s advice to the NHS last summer ‘reform or die’. Under the ten-year plan, funding for Trusts is increasingly being linked to health outcome success, with those who successfully deliver granted further autonomy. This will enable Trusts to make estate decisions with a clear focus on patient and population health, rather than being bound by red tape or short-term
68 Health Estate Journal August 2026
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72
