search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CAPITAL PROGRAMMES


What the data shows: readiness across the programme The findings from the programme director survey are striking. Approximately 75 per cent of NHP programmes reported that they were unclear on the specific operational changes needed to deliver their business case assumptions. More significantly still, not one programme surveyed was actively tracking transformation metrics alongside construction milestones. In a programme that places considerable emphasis on standardised design, governance, and construction efficiency, transformation – the very thing that determines whether a new hospital delivers the outcomes it was built for – remains largely unmonitored and unassured at programme level. This finding has direct and immediate relevance for estates and programme leaders. The Gateway Review process, which provides structured independent assurance at key decision points in capital programmes, does not currently require transformation readiness to be evidenced with the same rigour as construction or financial milestones. The research argues compellingly that this must change.


Implications for programme leaders The research sets out a four-stage framework for embedding transformation within capital programmes, which translates directly into a set of practical imperatives for those leading NHP schemes and analogous capital investments: 1. Reframe and quantify the ambition. Programme leaders must understand and explicitly quantify the transformation gap – the gap between where their organisation is today and where it needs to be on opening day. This requires honest, evidence-based


analysis of current performance against business case assumptions, and a clear articulation of the risk if the gap is not closed. Too often, the research found, this analysis is either not conducted or its conclusions are not translated into funded action plans.


2. Create real confidence through early action. Transformation trajectories must be mapped to specific projects and milestones, not left as abstract commitments. Investment cases for transformation must be developed and secured separately from the capital case. Pilot and test-and-learn programmes should begin years before opening, treating go-live as the final validation of a well-tested model rather than the first real test of an untested one.


Royal Liverpool University Hospital.


August 2026 Health Estate Journal 59


Matt Livey Architectural Photography, NBBJ and HKS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72