TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT MMC THENING INDUSTRY RESILIENCE
take on Modern Methods of Construction.
Rethinking traditional models
Industrialisation presents an opportunity to rethink traditional delivery models by bringing key design decisions forward and enabling greater certainty earlier, reducing late stage design changes. Early engagement with contractors, specialists, and the supply chain, often from RIBA Stage 2, is critical to test feasibility, ensure buildability and secure the programme duration. A well-crafted programme underpins successful project delivery, driving profitability, supporting risk management, and ensuring timely completion, but it relies on the right tools, strategies, and early stakeholder alignment. MMC supports this by reducing weather delays, easing labour constraints, and providing data-driven lead times for shorter, more predictable programmes. By factoring in early consideration of MMC into our programmed activities, we are able to integrate Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA) principles before detailed design, making them integral to design intent rather than a later change. IC’s early and collaborative decision-making model enables the proactive mitigation of risks inherent in traditional delivery models, minimising disproportionate risk transfer, and achieving early alignment with Building
Safety Act Gateway 2 requirements. The NHP’s Hospital 2.0 (H2.0) takes early- stage planning a step further, unlocking programmatic design and delivery efficiencies through a standardised, industry-leading template design and integrated kit of parts, underpinned by sustainability and long-term adaptability. H2.0’s pre-designed structural and non- structural components use repeatable geometries, pre-tested for spatial coordination, ready for fabrication at pace, reducing complexities, risk, changes and cost, with each fabricated product accompanied by its own ‘digital twin’, stored for future maintenance records. While MMC solutions can attract a cost premium, depending on site, system, and volume procured, greater investment and adoption through programmes like NHP will help develop workforce capability, drive standardisation, and increase market competitiveness. Although higher levels of design input may be required upfront, MMC has consistently demonstrated significant reductions in construction programmes, alongside known improvements in health and safety, sustainability, and embodied carbon performance. When considering the cost of MMC, we need to consider the value of earlier completion and commencement of its core function within the economic case.
In the long term, wider adoption of MMC has the potential to strengthen industry resilience, support economic growth, and equip the next generation of construction professionals with the skills needed for a more modern and efficient built environment.
Significant and
Key drivers such as health & safety, sustainability, speed of construction and, of course, cost should be at the heart of the decision-making process of informing delivery methodology
lasting value The evidence for MMC is increasingly difficult to ignore as IC has become mainstream within many parts of the UK market. Within the healthcare sector, MMC-integrated projects regularly deliver significant benefits. At Poole Hospital, a hybrid Category 2, 3 and 5 MMC approach enabled the new theatres block to be completed 14 weeks ahead of programme through early collaboration and strong trust between the design team, contractor and specialist suppliers. At Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Category 5 MEP assemblies supported efficient installation and delivery against demanding timelines. Meanwhile, a 450-bed critical care facility in Cwmbran, Wales, utilised Category 2 and 3 MMC solutions to achieve a 42-week programme saving, approximately 23 per cent of the overall schedule, while opening defect-free. Across the healthcare sector, MMC suppliers are consistently delivering facilities faster and more cost-effectively. These projects demonstrate that MMC is no longer a theoretical aspiration, but a proven delivery model delivering measurable improvements in programme certainty, quality, productivity, and value. By capturing and applying lessons learned at scale, major programmes such as the NHP can deliver significant and lasting value across the UK through industrialised construction.
August 2026 Health Estate Journal 17
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72
