search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MICROSCOPY & IMAGING 69


Right: A Linkam FDCS196 stage mounted on a Zeiss optical microscope located in the GILYOS laboratories


FREEZE DRYING


MICROSCOPY IN D


r Henning Gieseler leads the Freeze Drying Focus Group (FDFG) in the Division of


Pharmaceutics at the Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nuremberg. He started his research in this area in 2006 after first coming across freeze drying microscopy (FDM) during his post doc at the University of Connecticut in the USA, where he used a Linkam FDSC196 stage. Tis led in the following years to a collaboration with Linkam on the development of innovative instrumentation dedicated to improve freeze drying characterisation methods. Te pharmaceutical industry demands as much knowledge on formulation behaviour as possible to design optimum and robust freeze drying cycles. Most recent analysis approaches tend towards miniaturisation of the freeze drying process, with the ultimate goal to minimise the amount of drug used for development. Te main research goal is to have a


representative measure of the temperature point (or region) where the product starts


Case study on the work of Dr Henning Gieseler in the field of pharmaceutical freeze drying


to undergo structural (morphological) changes during primary drying of a freeze drying cycle. Tese changes can be visually detected, in form of ‘shrinkage’ or ‘collapse’. It is essentially the point where a (rigid) glassy system starts to flow (decrease in viscosity). Tis temperature point is specific for every single formulation in the world. Product defects or imperfections, such as collapse, are of regulatory concern and might impede pharmaceutical quality parameters. Conventional FDM allows the determination of the so-called ‘onset of collapse temperature, Toc.’ Tis measurement is performed using 2-3 µL of liquid placed between two glass cover slips. Tis experimental set-up reflects a 2D measurement, i.e. on the pore size level. In other words, during freeze drying, the product would not show the expected level of collapse when exposed to the same process temperatures applied during the FDM measurement. In order to get a more complete understanding of product behaviour, a scale-up of the measurement was required


to cover the full performance range and test product behaviour at larger volumes when in a commercial vial. Tis would then be a 3D experiment which would be more reflective of a typical freeze drying cycle. Together, these complementary techniques allow a better understanding of formulation in the frozen state and of the scale up factors (from 2µL to 5mL) which allow improved process optimisation.


New vial system developed Te work over the past two years has led to the production of Linkam’s freeze drying vial system (FDVS). Tis development came in part from the excellent work of one of Dr Gieseler’s PhD students, Zixin Huang. Dr Gieseler comments on the collaboration: “Our work with Linkam has enabled the release of a cost-effective solution with a small footprint for freeze drying optimisation. We have also seen that the new Optical DSC performs a complementary role in the process.”


www.scientistlive.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84