search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ANALYTICAL AND LABORATORY EQUIPMENT15


The laboratory carries out a wide range of microbiological tests, which adds value by supporting, developing and optimising the baking process


DATA MANAGEMENT LIMS TRANSFORMS Case study showcasing the importance of a LIMS in a cereals, milling and baking science lab T


he use of a laboratory information management system (LIMS) in the Cereal, Milling and Baking


Science Laboratory at Allied Technical Centre (ATC) is a perfect example of how a fl exible, confi gurable LIMS can be adapted by the users themselves to meet changing requirements. Successive versions of the Matrix Gemini LIMS have been implemented at ATC, beginning with V2 in the late 1990s.


The background Allied Technical Centre Berkshire, UK, is part of Associated British Foods (ABF). ATC provides technical leadership in a number of areas, including food safety, food law, product assurance and nutrition, bakery development, environmental management, consumer contact management and cereals, milling and baking science. Facilities include a UKAS- accredited Cereals, Milling and Baking Science laboratory, pilot milling and controlled-temperature shelf-life rooms. T e laboratory acts as a primary reference laboratory for the Milling & Baking Group as well as providing a testing service for other clients. T e laboratory carries out a wide range of microbiological tests, which


adds value by supporting, developing and optimising the baking process. T is in turn drives process control to enable delivery of consistent product quality and optimum production effi ciency. By monitoring and evaluating ingredient functionality, manufacturing costs can be minimised. T e laboratory also has a role to play in new product development and product formulation


Challenges Prior to 1997 ATC used a LIMS that was popular in its day but was fairly crude in its capabilities and infl exible to use. Nevertheless, the head of Analytical Services at ATC at the time recognised the importance of LIMS and the potential it had to off er the company, so instigated the purchase of a new, Windows-based LIMS. T e initial requirements for the LIMS were simply for sample registration and job logging, but it was recognised that much more could be accomplished with a system that could grow with the laboratory to meet its changing needs. T e challenge was therefore not just to fi nd a system that made this possible but to actually implement these changes, as required over an extended period of time.


Following a successful demonstration


by Autoscribe that highlighted the company’s expertise in the fi eld of LIMS and the capability and confi gurability of the product, Matrix V2 was purchased. Initially it was not operated as a full LIMS, but confi gured for registering samples and logging jobs. T e fi rst database used was Microsoft Access. Following training on the confi guration of Matrix, the ATC Technical Support team took ownership of Matrix and began an internal development program that has continued to the present day, to use the LIMS to the best benefi t of the laboratory. A variety of capabilities have been added over the years. T ese include:


 Incorporation of internal and external costing information into the sample registration screens – this allows invoice generation for work conducted for non-ABF companies and an allocation of eff ort for work carried out for ABF companies


 Development of individually confi gured registration pages for wheat, fl our and milled products, and baked product samples


 Addition of runsheets into the system www.scientistlive.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84