search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Bushmeat trade in northern Ghana 221


FIG. 3 Characteristics and compositions (per cent of the total number of carcasses) of bushmeat recorded in the three markets, by taxonomic group.


Determinants of the numbers of bushmeat carcasses recorded


FIG. 2 (a) Number of carcasses and (b) biomass of bushmeat recorded in the three markets (Fig. 1) during the study period, grouped by taxonomic groups.


preferences of customers, traders or hunters. Amphibian trade also varied between markets: the trade in Fumbisi and Sandema was dominated by amphibians, but trade in amphibians was absent in Chiana (Fig. 3). Where amphibians were traded, they were available in


large numbers. During the study, totals of 5,289 and 3,231 frogs, accounting for 80 and 89% of total trade (in terms of individual carcasses), were recorded in Fumbisi and Sandema, respectively. There was seasonal variation in this trade, with a peak during the dry season. This trend was seen in trade in general, with the majority (76%) of the trade by carcass number recorded during the dry season, corresponding to 75% of the total biomass. This seasonal difference was observed across all three markets. Generally, Sandema traded mainly in small-bodied spe-


cies, largely amphibians, lagomorphs and rodents. Sandema accounted for only 7% of ungulate carcasses and primates were absent. The trade in Chiana was dominated by larger- bodied animals. Aardvarks Orycteropus afer, African buffa- lo, olive baboon and roan antelope were recorded exclusive- ly in Chiana. The majority of the primates (90 of 134; 67%) and ungulates (43 of 73; 59%) were recorded in Chiana (Fig. 3), with primates comprising the bulk of the trade by carcass number in this market (50% of the animals recorded).


Variations between markets in numbers of carcasses traded per survey day were further highlighted in the results from the generalized linear models (Table 2). Whether or not amphibians were included, the modelled estimates of the numbers of carcasses sold in Chiana per survey day were significantly lower than those in the other two markets (trade volumes were 4.78 times and 0.24 times higher in Fumbisi and Sandema, respectively). Overall, carnivores followed by ungulates were the least traded species group. Fewer carcasses were sold in the wet season than in the dry season. These results were similar whether or not am- phibians were included in the analysis, although the effects of market and season were more pronounced with the inclusion of amphibians (Table 2). Model outputs also reflected the observed seasonal trends


across all three markets (Poisson generalized linear model analysis of deviance; χ(1,324) = 10.90,P,0.01). These differ- ences were evident even with the exclusion of amphibians from the analysis (Poisson generalized linear model analysis of deviance; χ(1,283) = 10.32,P,0.01). Estimates from the generalized linear model demonstrated that a mean of 57.4% fewer animals were traded in the wet season (Table 2).


Price of bushmeat


Bushmeat was sold in various forms. Smaller-sized species such as birds, reptiles, lagomorphs and rodents were sold as whole carcasses, whereas frogs were sold in bundles com- prising 7–25 whole carcasses. Larger species were butchered and sold as pieces. The prices of mammal species ranged


Oryx, 2023, 57(2), 216–227 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605322000096


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140