search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
146 Conservation news


These approaches are now well accepted and utilized in spa- tial and conservation planning. Until recently, such an approach had yet to focus on sharks


Scarabaeus laticollis on a fresh cow dung pat in southern France. Photo: C. Leandro.


The IUCN Red List conservation status assessment for


400 South African species of dung beetle began in July 2022 and soon we will launch the assessment of 200 species from Australia and 300 species from South America. In due course, we hope to engage with the agricultural sector (farmers, ranchers and veterinarians) through communica- tion outreach. In the long term, we hope to work on the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas and conservation planning for dung beetles. If you would like to get involved in the work of this new


Specialist Group or contribute your expertise to conserva- tion assessments, please fill in the form at forms.gle/ kNW6CMxQHPbMp57b6. The more diverse the network, the more relevant our actions will be for the conservation of dung beetles globally.


CAMILA LEANDRO ( orcid.org/0000-0003-1153-326X, camila. leandro@univ-montp3.fr) co-chair of the Dung Beetle Specialist Group, Montpellier, France. FERNANDO VAZ-DE- MELLO ( orcid.org/0000-0001-9697-320X) co-chair of the Dung Beetle Specialist Group, Cuiabá, Brazil


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits un- restricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Important Shark and Ray Areas: a new tool to optimize spatial planning for sharks


Spatial planning is a priority for biodiversity conservation, and area-based measures have become a key element for identification of sites that are particularly important for bio- diversity. Initiatives have been developed for specific taxa, such as birds (Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas) and marine mammals (Important Marine Mammal Areas) and for biodiversity more generally (Key Biodiversity Areas and Ecological or Biologically Significant Marine Areas).


and their relatives, the rays and chimaeras (hereafter collect- ively referred to as sharks), one of themost threatened faunal lineages (37%of species are categorized as threatenedwith ex- tinction on the IUCN Red List). Overexploitation, unregu- lated or poorly managed fisheries and trade and, to a lesser extent, habitat degradation and loss, are driving steep declines inmany shark populations. Existing area-based conservation approaches have not been designed with this conservation challenge in mind and have not adequately responded to the risk profile of sharks globally. To address this, the IUCN Species Survival Commission


Shark Specialist Group undertook extensive engagement and consultation to develop the Important Shark and Ray Area framework. Modelled on Important Marine Mam- mal Areas, the development of criteria considered the diverse life histories and unique attributes of sharks. The criteria are applied to identify areas based on shark vulner- ability (e.g. species assessed as threatened on the IUCN Red List), range restriction, life history (reproduction, feed- ing, resting, movement, undefined aggregations), and spe- cial attributes (distinctiveness, diversity; Hyde et al., 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 968853). Resulting Important Shark and RayAreas are discrete, three-dimensional portions of habitat that are important for one or more shark species and have the potential to be managed for conservation. Funded by the Shark Conservation Fund, the Important


Shark and Ray Area project has begun working through 13 global regions, covering all marine and inland waters where sharks occur. The project brings together regional experts to contribute knowledge and identify important areas. In the first workshop (in Bogotá, Colombia, in October 2022), 55 experts delineated important areas from the Gulf of California, Mexico, to southern Chile in the Eastern Pacific. This week-long process identified 76 candidate Important Shark and Ray Areas, now under review by an independent review panel. The candidates accepted will appear on the Important Shark and Ray Area e-Atlas, an open access tool for exploring areas important for sharks (sharkrayareas.org/e-atlas). The next workshop will be held in theMediterranean and Black Sea region in early 2023. The Important Shark and Ray Area process will give


governments and policy makers access to scientifically de- fined areas that can help them advance actions to conserve sharks. This tool will help countries achieve the Convention on Biological Diversity Global Biodiversity Framework 30 × 30 target (30% of global land and sea conserved through protected areas and other effective area-based con- servation measures by 2030). Complementary to other area- based measures, we anticipate that Important Shark and Ray Areas will be integrated into the recognition of global sites that hold high biodiversity. Overall, delineating Important


Oryx, 2023, 57(2), 145–148 © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605322001624


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140