Rapid dung removal by beetles 187
duikers (Cephalophus and Philantomba spp.) and red river hogs (Potamochaerus porcus) in the Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park, Republic of Congo: dung decay and its implication for population estimates. African Journal of Ecology, 48, 551–554.
EKOBO,A. (1998) Large Mammals and Vegetation Surveys in the Boumba-Bek and Nki Project Area. Unpublished report. WWF Cameroon, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
ELENGA, G., BONENFANT,C.&PÉRON,G. (2020) Distance sampling of duikers in the rainforest: dealing with transect avoidance. PLOS ONE, 15,e0240049.
FA, J.E., PERES, C.A. &MEEUWIG,J.(2002) Bushmeat exploitation in tropical forests: an intercontinental comparison. Conservation Biology, 16, 232–237.
ICHIKAWA,M.(2014) Forest conservation and Indigenous peoples in the Congo basin: new trends toward reconciliation between global issues and local interest. In Hunter-gatherers of the Congo Basin: Cultures, Histories, and Biology of African Pygmies (ed. B.S. Hewlett), pp. 321–342. Transaction, New Brunswick, USA.
JOST ROBINSON, C.A., ZOLLNER, P.A. & KPANOU, J.B. (2017) Night and day: evaluating transect methodologies to monitor duikers in the Dzanga-Sangha protected areas, Central African Republic. African Journal of Ecology, 55, 222–232.
KAMGAING, T.O.W., BOBO, K.S., DJEKDA, D., AZOBOU, K.B.V., HAMADJIDA, B.R., BALANGOUNDE, M.Y. et al. (2018) Population density estimates of forest duikers (Philantomba monticola & Cephalophus spp.) differ greatly between survey methods. African Journal of Ecology, 56, 908–916.
KOERNER, S.E., POULSEN, J.R., BLANCHARD, E.J., OKOUYI,J.& CLARK, C.J. (2017) Vertebrate community composition and diversity declines along a defaunation gradient radiating from rural villages in Gabon. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 805–814.
KOSTER, S.H. & HART, J.A. (1988) Methods of estimating ungulate populations in tropical forests. African Journal of Ecology, 26, 117–126.
LAING, S.E., BUCKLAND, S.T., BURN, R.W., LAMBIE,D. & AMPHLETT, A. (2003) Dung and nest surveys: estimating decay rates. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 1102–1111.
LETOUZEY,R.(1985) Carte Phytogéographique du Cameroun au 1:500000. Institut de la Recherche Agronomique (Herbier National), Toulouse, France.
MARQUES, F.F.C., BUCKLAND, S.T., GOFFIN, D., DIXON, C.E., BORCHERS, D.L.,MAYLE, B.A.&PEACE, A.J. (2001) Estimating deer abundance from line transect surveys of dung: sika deer in southern Scotland: Estimating deer abundance from dung surveys. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 349–363.
MARTIN, E.A., ROS BRULL, G., FUNK, S.M., LUISELLI, L.,OKALE,R. & FA, J.E. (2020)Wild meat hunting and use by sedentarised Baka pygmies in southeastern Cameroon. PeerJ, 8,e9906.
NZOOH DONGMO, Z.L., NGORAN, K.P., EKODECK, H., KOBLA, A.S., FAMEGNI, S., SOMBAMBO,M.&MENGAMENYA,A. (2016) Les Populations de Grands et Moyens Mammifères dans le Segment Lobéké et du Tri-National de la Sangha. Unpublished report. WWF/Sangha Tri-National Foundation/Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
PAYNE, J.C. (1992) A field study of techniques for estimating densities of duikers in Korup National Park, Cameroon. PhD thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
PYHÄLÄ, A., OROZCO, A.O. & COUNSELL,S.(2016) Protected Area in the Congo Basin: Failing both People and Biodiversity? The Rainforest Foundation, London, UK.
RCORE TEAM (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
ROBINSON, J.G., REDFORD, K.H. & BENNETT, E.L. (1999)Wildlife harvest in logged tropical forests. Science, 284, 595–596.
THOMAS, L., BUCKLAND, S.T., REXSTAD, E.A., LAAKE, J.L., STRINDBERG, S.,HEDLEY, S.L. et al. (2010) Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 5–14.
VAN VLIET,N.&NASI,R.(2008) Why do models fail to assess properly the sustainability of duiker (Cephalophus spp.) hunting in Central Africa? Oryx, 42, 392–399.
VAN VLIET, N., NASI,R. & LUMARET, J.P. (2009) Factors influencing duiker dung decay in north-east Gabon: are dung beetles hiding duikers? African Journal of Ecology, 47, 40–47.
VIQUERAT, S., BOBO, K.S., KIFFNER,C. &WALTERT,M.(2013)A comparison of regression-based estimates of dung decay in two African forest duiker species. Ecotropica, 19, 33–38.
WHITE, L.J.T. (1994) Biomass of rain forest mammals in the lope reserve, Gabon. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 499.
WHITE,L.&EDWARDS, A. (eds) (2000) Conservation Research in the African Rain Forests: A Technical Handbook.Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, USA.
WILKIE, D.S. & CARPENTER, J.F. (1999) Bushmeat hunting in the Congo basin: an assessment of impacts and options for mitigation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 927–955.
WILKIE, D.S. & FINN, J.T. (1990) Slash–burn cultivation and mammal abundance in the Ituri Forest, Zaire. Biotropica, 22, 90.
YASUOKA,H.(2006) The sustainability of duiker (Cephalophus spp.) hunting for the Baka hunter-gatherers in southeastern Cameroon. African Study Monographs, 33, 95–120.
YASUOKA, H., HIRAI, M., KAMGAING, T.O.W., DZEFACK, Z.C.B., KAMDOUM, E.C.&BOBO, K.S. (2015) Changes in the composition of hunting catches in southeastern Cameroon: a promising approach for collaborative wildlife management between ecologists and local hunters. Ecology and Society, 20, 25.
Oryx, 2023, 57(2), 180–187 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001599
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140
