Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
intervention program and how the element of competition could be further applied to promote hand hygiene compliance. It is essential to collect data on exposure to the intervention compo- nents to understand the effects. Future research could focus more on behavioral and environmental factors thatmight influence hand hygiene compliance such as access and availability of ABHR on a ward. In Dutch hospitals, the presence of AHBR is highly recom- mended (and checked) in organizations. However, the influence of location of ABHR on hand hygiene compliance could also be examined. These insights can be applied to further improving hand hygiene compliance, and ultimately, decreasing HAIs.
Acknowledgements. We extend our appreciation all 10 healthcare organi- zations of the ‘Collaborating Rijnmond Hospitals’ for their participation. In addition, we also thank the Erasmus Trustfund for their financial support in the costs of visiting the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) in Madrid, Spain, on April 21–24, 2018.
Financial support. “Roll Up Your Sleeves” was funded by CZ, a Dutch healthcare insurer. However, CZ was in no way involved in data collection, data analysis, or writing of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest. The authors state no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
References
1. Global Patient Safety Challenge. World Alliance for patient Safety. World Health Organization website.
http://www.who.int/patientsafety/events/05/ GPSC_Launch_ENGLISH_FINAL.pdf. Published 2006. Accessed October 3, 2018.
2. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections 1988. Am J Infect Control 1991;85:818–827.
3. Metha Y GA, Todi S, Myatra S, et al. Guideline for prevention of hospital acquired infections. Ind J Crit Care Med 2014;18:149–163.
4. Klevens R ER, Richards C, Horan T, Gaynes R, Pollock D. Estimating healthcare-associated infections and deaths in US hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rept 2007;122:160–166.
5. Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicro- bial use in European acute-care hospitals. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control website.
https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/ media/en/publications/Publications/healthcare-associated-infections-anti microbial-use-PPS.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed October 4, 2018.
6. Annual epidemiological report on communicable diseases in Europe, 2008. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control website.
https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publica- tions/0812_SUR_Annual_Epidemiological_Report_2008.pdf. Published 2008. Accessed October 3, 2018.
7. Report on the burden of endemic healthcare-associated infection world- wide. World Health Organization website.
http://apps.who.int/iris/bit stream/handle/10665/80135/9789241501507_eng.pdf;jsessionid=474C23F B978EE9A0D65F779A4492B95A?sequence=1 Published 2011. Accessed October 5, 2018.
8. Duckro AN, Blom DW, Lyle EA, Weinstein RA, Hayden MK. Transfer of vancomycin-resistant enterococci via healthcare worker hands. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:302–307.
9. Zawacki A, O’Rourke E, Potter-Bynoe G, Macone A, Harbarth S, Goldmann D. An outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia and bloodstream infection associated with intermittent otitis externa in a healthcare worker. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:1083–1089.
10. WHO guidelines on health hygiene in healthcare. World Health Organization webiste.
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/
193
44102/9789241597906_eng.pdf;jsessionid=0FC42317C9203EC727C5F37 CC568EBF3?sequence=1. Published 2009. Accessed October 3, 2018.
11. Auditing with the Five Moments for Hand Hygiene tool. Australia HH.
https://www.hha.org.au/audits/audit-tools/standard-5-moments. Published 2011. Accessed October 4, 2018
12. Erasmus V, Daha TJ, Brug H, et al. Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:283–294.
13. Pittet D. Improving compliance with hand hygiene in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:381–386.
14. Bischoff WE, Reynolds TM, Sessler CN, Edmond MB, Wenzel RP. Handwashing compliance by healthcare workers: the impact of introdu- cing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1017–1021.
15. Azim S, Juergens C, McLaws ML. An average hand hygiene day for nurses and physicians: the burden is not equal. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:777–781.
16. Pittet D, Mourouga P, Perneger TV. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital infection control program. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:126–130.
17. Erasmus V, Brouwer W, van Beeck EF, et al. A qualitative exploration of reasons for poor hand hygiene among hospital workers: lack of positive role models and of convincing evidence that hand hygiene prevents cross- infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:415–419.
18. Gould DJ, Moralejo D, Drey N, Chudleigh JH, Taljaard M. Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;9:CD005186.
19. Lydon S, Power M, McSharry J, et al. Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in the ICU: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:e1165–e1172.
20. Stiller A, Salm F, Bischoff P, Gastmeier P. Relationship between hospital ward design and healthcare-associated infection rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:51.
21. White KM, Starfelt LC, Jimmieson NL, et al. Understanding the determinants of Australian hospital nurses’ hand hygiene decisions following the implementation of a national hand hygiene initiative. Health Educ Res 2015;30:959–970.
22. Al Salman JM, Hani S, de Marcellis-Warin N, Isa SF. Effectiveness of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system on healthcare workers’ compliance to guidelines. J Infect Public Health 2015;8:117–126.
23. Gaynor M. What do we know about competition and quality in healthcare markets? Bristol Institute for Public Affairs website.
https://www.bristol.
ac.uk/media-library/sites/cmpo/migrated/documents/wp151.pdf. Pub- lished 2006. Accessed October 5, 2018.
24. Propper C, Dixon J. Competition between hospitals. New Labour’s Market Reforms, chapter 6.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ 930e/2b3399f1b459223709e41e6262ea1386dcf6.pdf. Published 2011. Accessed October 4, 2018.
25. Luangasanatip N, Hongsuwan M, Limmathurotsakul D, et al. Comparative efficacy of interventions to promote hand hygiene in hospital: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2015;351:h3728.
26. Fuller C, Michie S, Savage J, McAteer J, Besser S, Charlett A, et al. The Feedback Intervention Trial (FIT)—improving hand-hygiene compliance in UK healthcare workers: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2012;7:e41617.
27. Moro ML, Morsillo F, Nascetti S, Parenti M, Allegranzi B, Pompa MG, et al. Determinants of success and sustainability of the WHO multimodal hand hygiene promotion campaign, Italy, 2007–2008 and 2014. Euro Surveill. 2017;22:pii30546. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.
28. Maury E, Moussa N, Lakermi C, Barbut F, Offenstadt G. Compliance of health care workers to hand hygiene: awareness of being observed is important. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:2088–2089.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156
